Credit Archives - Page 54 of 82 - Kingcade Garcia McMaken, P.A. Bankruptcy Attorneys

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Debt Collectors Come under Fire in Recent Lawsuit

Posted on September 2, 2014by Admin

The U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed its first lawsuit against Frederick J. Hanna & Associates, a debt-collection firm, based in Marietta, GA. The firm is accused of violating federal consumer protection laws, processing more than 350,000 credit card collection complaints against consumers, some of whom may owe nothing or owed less than was claimed.

These collection practices are widespread. Roughly 77 million Americans have debt in collections, according to a recent study published by Urban Institute. CFPB officials say the regulator may sue law firms if they operate as debt-collection businesses rather than legal advisers.

The vast majority of borrowers sued in these cases do not appear in court and as a result, many of the cases end in a default judgment allowing the collector to garnish wages, freeze bank accounts or put a lien on property. These judgments can be difficult to correct.

CFPB officials are weighing regulations that would impose tougher requirements on debt collectors to establish they have the right to collect on a debt and ensure the amount is accurate. These rules would also impact banks and debt buyers as well.

Legal experts say the suit could signal the regulator’s intent to target similar high-volume law firms, and potentially banks and debt buyers, over allegations that debt collection claims can be out of date, incorrect in their amounts, lacking in documentary support or overlapping with claims filed against the same debtors.

If you are in a financial crisis and considering filing for bankruptcy, contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney who can advise you of all of your options. As an experienced CPA as well as a proven bankruptcy lawyer, Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys’ help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Timothy Kingcade Posts

New FICO Model Could Boost Credit Scores for Millions

Posted on August 19, 2014by Admin

FICO, the company responsible for the most widely used credit score in the U.S. announced this month that its newest scoring model will differ drastically from past versions. Known as FICO 9, the new model will take effect in fall 2014. FICO 9 will differ from FICO 8 in two major ways:

1.) It will differential between medical and non-medical bills that have been turned over to collections. Medical bills will no longer carry as much weight in consumers’ credit scores. Currently, FICO 8 makes no distinction between unpaid medical and non-medical bills.

2.) It will disregard accounts in collections that consumers have already paid. Currently, FICO 8 makes no distinction between paid and unpaid accounts in collections.

Treating medical debt differently comes as a welcome change to consumers. In a May 2014 report, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) said millions of Americans’ credit scores are being “overly penalized” by medical debts in collections.

So how do you know if your credit score will improve because of the new model? Basically, if your credit score is low as a result of unpaid medical bills or bills that went into collections that you later paid, you are likely to get a significant boost from FICO 9 when it takes effect.

Remember, you have the power to boost your credit score by following these “money smart” moves:
• Pay your bills on time.
• Keep your balance on credit cards below 30% of your total credit limit at ALL times.
• Using credit as early in your adult life as possible.
• Keeping a good mix of credit accounts on your credit report.
• Applying only for credit that you actually need.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Grieving parents hit with $200,000 in student loans

Posted on August 12, 2014by Admin

Losing their 27-year old daughter, Lisa, to liver failure was devastating enough, but then the student loan bills started coming. Steve Mason and his wife Darnell immediately took in their daughter’s three children- ages 4, 7 and 9 following her death. The family had co-signed on $100,000 in private student loans that his daughter took out for nursing school. Unable to keep up with the payments and mounting expenses, the $100,000 debt ballooned to $200,000 as a result of late fees and interest rates as high as 12%.

Steve called the lenders to explain he could not afford the $2,000 a month payments, but unfortunately private lenders are not bound by any federal requirements to help borrowers or co-signers. Loan forgiveness is up to the discretion of the individual lender. Navient Corp., which manages several of the loans said they reduced the balance owed to $27,000 from nearly $35,000 and lowered the interest rate to 0% on three of four loans. The family was less fortunate with American Education Services, which handled the bulk of Lisa’s student loans. The lender refused to provide the family with any relief.

Dreams for retirement have been shattered for the Masons. The family has considered filing bankruptcy, but student loans are the only type of debt that generally cannot be discharged through bankruptcy. Legislation aiming to help families in similar situations, including recent bills that would allow student loan debt to be discharged in bankruptcy, have been introduced over the years but have yet to pass in Congress.

“People with other debt from splurging — they can discharge that,” Mason said. “Student loans should really be the one type of debt they do discharge because it’s done to further an education and career. But somehow getting [my daughter] an education has encumbered me for the rest of my life.”

The Masons are not alone. Similar financial nightmares are facing families throughout the country. For now, the only option parents have is to negotiate a payment plan with the lender or try to prove undue financial hardship to the courts in order to get the debts discharged in bankruptcy.

For borrowers who are struggling with student loan debt, relief options are available. Many student loan borrowers are unaware that they have rights and repayment options available to them, such as postponement of loan payments, reduction of payments or even a complete discharge of the debt. It is important you contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney who can advise you of all of your options. As an experienced CPA as well as a proven bankruptcy lawyer, Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys’ help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Five Store Credit Cards to Avoid

Posted on August 8, 2014by Admin

According to a survey of 61 major retail credit cards by CreditCards.com, retail credit cards are becoming debt traps for consumers. Many of these cards have an average APR of 23.23%, compared with 15.03% for other credit cards. This means a consumer who spends $1,000 on a retail card, and made only the minimum payments, would spend more than six years repaying that balance and end up paying a total of $1,840 for the $1,000 item. That is equivalent to an 84% markup!

Retail credit cards sometimes have benefits that may be worth it to consumers who frequently shop at the store and pay the balance off in full every month. Many of these cards come with perks like store discounts, special sales and rewards for cardholders. But miss one payment one month and you run into trouble on most of these credit cards.

Below are the retail credit cards to steer clear of, according to the CreditCards.com survey:

1. Zales has up to a 28.99% APR.
2. Office Depot Personal Credit Card has a 27.99% APR.
3. Staples Personal Account has a 27.99% APR.
4. My Best Buy has up to 25.24% and 27.99% APR, depending on your credit score.
5. My Best Buy Preferred has a 25.24% and 27.99% APR, depending on your credit score.

Bottom line: Retail credit cards are a bad idea for anyone who does not pay their balance off in full every month, because the interest rates are so exorbitant.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Foreclosures, Timothy Kingcade Posts

When should you consider bankruptcy?

Posted on July 29, 2014by Admin

Many consumers struggling to pay off credit card debt or medical bills wonder when the right time is to file for bankruptcy- or if bankruptcy is even the best option for them. It makes little sense to continue struggling against a mound of debt you are not even making a dent in with monthly payments– or maybe you are no longer able to afford those payments. A good rule thumb is, if it would take you five years or more to repay what you owe, you should consider filing for bankruptcy. Why five years? Because that is how long you would be required to make payments under a Chapter 13 repayment plan.

However, most consumers qualify for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which is typically faster (takes approximately three to four months, as opposed to five years) and erases all of your credit card debt and medical bills. If lower interest rates would help you pay off the debt within five years, consider scheduling an appointment with a credit counselor associated with the National Foundation for Credit Counseling (www.nfcc.org). These nonprofits can set you up with debt management plans that may offer you lower rates on your credit card debt.

Many people feel an obligation to pay what they owe, even if in reality they will never be able to pay off the debt. Bankruptcy laws allow individuals to gain a fresh start, so they can take care of themselves and their families. If you are behind on your mortgage payments, filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy can allow you to stay in your home and catch up on your payments or negotiate with your lender. This is all thanks to the automatic stay which immediately goes into effect and prohibits your mortgage lender from foreclosing on your home.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Beware of Filing Bankruptcy Pro Se

Posted on July 10, 2014by Admin

The Internet has given average consumers the ability to Google everything from how to change a flat tire to how to replace a kitchen sink. However, there are certain tasks that should be left to the professionals. Filing for bankruptcy is one of them.

Bankruptcy laws significantly changed in 2005, making it more difficult to file. There are also crucial steps in the bankruptcy process, including appearing before a bankruptcy trustee and a meeting of creditors. These two steps can be intimidating for individuals not familiar with the process. Not to mention the complex legal forms involved with filing bankruptcy. A single mistake or oversight on one of these forms can cause you to lose your property and assets or your case to be dismissed.

Consulting with an experienced bankruptcy attorney will help you fully understand your legal options and avoid these pitfalls. The court in the 1973 case of The Florida Bar v. American Legal & Business Forms, Inc. ruled that non-attorneys selling package forms or “kits” for performing legal services as the unauthorized practice of law if any instructions or advice on their preparation is included.

The recent case, In re Falck reveals how some predatory individuals have taken advantage of consumers who are struggling to manage their debt and stay in their homes. The defendants solicited debtors through the mail pitching their mortgage foreclosure defense scheme. They charged debtors monthly payments, along with illegal and excessive fees, and then later claimed the debtor never paid. These individuals were not licensed attorneys in Florida or in any other state and did not file the proper disclosures. The court noted there were hundreds of debtors victimized by this mortgage foreclosure protection scheme.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Credit Repair Company GUILTY of Deceiving Consumers and Lying to Credit Bureaus

Posted on July 8, 2014by Admin

RMCN Credit Services, Inc., one of the nation’s largest credit repair companies, has been ordered to pay $2.35 million in civil penalties after it violated federal law by deceiving consumers and lying to credit bureaus. The company reportedly would charge consumers up-front fees- as much as $2,000 before rendering services. The court order bars the defendants, Doug and Julie Parker, the owners of the company, from similar conduct in the future. The company is also required to submit reports to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for a decade to ensure that it is incompliance with the terms of the order.

According to the FTC, the company “continued to send deceptive dispute letters to credit bureaus even after the company received detailed billing histories or signed contracts from creditors proving the credit reports were accurate. RMCN also falsely told consumers that federal law allowed it to dispute accurate credit report information and credit bureaus must either prove it or remove it.”

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Timothy Kingcade Posts

$8.25 Million Bonus Not Enough for Ex-Goldman Trader

Posted on July 2, 2014by Admin

Deeb Salem, an ex-Goldman Sachs mortgage trader is asking for more from the company he claims did him wrong. According to a transcript from the arbitration hearing, Salem told his mother three years ago that he expected $13 million for his “heroic efforts” to bring in $7 billion for the bank that year. The bonus he thought was owed to him was slightly down from the $15 million he received in 2009 and more than the $9 million bonus Goldman chief, Lloyd Blankfein took home that same year.

Salem claimed a Goldman credit trading executive said he was a “steal” at $15 million at a cocktail party. The reason for the reduced bonus was Salem’s “extremely poor judgment” in detailing his skillful manipulation of the market leading up to the housing crisis in a 2007 employee self-evaluation. In the evaluation, he described Goldman’s plan to “short squeeze” the mortgage market- what the Senate panel later viewed as “intentional market manipulation.”

Salem now wants Goldman to pay him $16 million. He is appealing to the New York State Supreme Court after being turned down by an industry arbitrator. The case is scheduled for September.

Click here to read more on this story.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/06/20/ex-goldman-trader-furious-over-paltry-8-25-million-bonus/?tid=hp_mm

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Debt Collectors Using Social Media to Track down Consumers

Posted on July 1, 2014by Admin

After dodging collection calls for more than 10 years, a Brighton Heights man said his experience with a third-party collection agency went from annoying to cyber stalking. He said his student loan debt ballooned from around $80,000 to $270,000 following years without payment. In 2012, he hired an attorney and an accountant to help him set up a payment plan. He believed the worst was behind him.

This was until a picture taken at Regent Square restaurant Square Café with PBS personality Rick Sebak was posted on Facebook and shared with more than 5,000 people. Within days, a person who was looking for him contacted the Square Café and left a number that traced back to the collection agency, Windham Professionals, Inc.

The laws outlined in the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act of 1977 apply to collection attempts made through digital media (i.e. – text messaging and social media). Full and honest disclosure of identity and the intent to collect a debt is mandatory for collection agencies.

The act prohibits the following:
• Contacting third parties without prior consent from the debtor or a court unless they are seeking location information for the debtor;
• It bans disclosing debt obligations to third parties;
• Contacting debtors BEFORE 8 a.m. and after 9 p.m.;
• Directly contacting consumers who have attorneys handling the debt (i.e. – bankruptcy attorney);
• Making false or misleading statements;
• Using obscene or profane language;
• Using threats of violence to collect.

Debt collectors who violate these provisions can face fines of up to $1,000 per violation- money that goes directly to the debtor.
If the debt collector in fact researched Square Café by becoming friends with the Brighton Heights man on Facebook under false pretenses or by connecting with the debtor’s friends under false pretenses and without prior consent, the company is in violation of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act.

Recently, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau clarified debt collection rules, including proposed guidance to financial institutions warning that the debt collection act also applies to digital forms of communication, including text messaging and social media.

It is important that consumers check their credit reports at AnnualCreditReport.com to ensure the debt being reported is what is being collected and to know their rights.

A 2014 report says last year the commission received 204,464 debt collection complaints, up from 202,616 in 2012. Thirty-eight percent involved collectors misrepresenting the type of debt, amount or status; 19.7 percent were failure to identify as a debt collector and 16.6 percent involved repeated calls to third parties.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Debt Collectors Paying the Price for Every Time They Call

Posted on June 30, 2014by Admin

Thanks to a new ruling, consumers who have requested debt collectors not call their cell phones are entitled to collect damages of up to $1,500 per call. In the recent 11th Circuit case, Osorio v. State Farm Bank, the court reinforced restrictions under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act that prohibits debt collectors from using automated dialing systems (i.e. – “robocalls”) to contact consumers on their cell phones without their permission.

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act has been federal law since 1991. However, this ruling is significant because in the past, courts have been divided as to whether consumers who have given their cell phone number to a creditor or collector can revoke that privilege, and if so, whether they can do so verbally. In this case, the court ruled in favor of consumers, giving them permission to revoke their consent verbally.

For consumers who are receiving calls for the wrong person, for debts they believe are not owed or for debts that are too old, this ruling proves extremely helpful. However, it important to remember that ignoring collection calls is not a good strategy. Keep accurate records of the collection calls and consider speaking with an experienced bankruptcy attorney who can guide you in the right direction and determine whether you qualify for bankruptcy protection.