Student loan debt has topped $1.3 trillion and impacts approximately 43 million Americans, prompting a variety of efforts to help struggling students pay for college. It is also a very hot topic politically, with both presidential candidates expressing concerns about the federal government profiting off these loans. While some attribute the decline of state funding to driving up education costs, the presidential campaign has emphasized what Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton has called “the crushing burden of debt.”
Hillary Clinton’s Plan
One of the provisions in Mrs. Clinton’s plan to provide tuition-free education at public colleges and universities for students whose families make under $125,000 a year has sparked the most debate. But when she originally rejected Democratic rival Bernie Sanders’ more expansive plan, it invoked a long-running argument about who should shoulder the costs.
“I disagree with free college for everybody. I don’t think taxpayers should be paying to send Donald Trump’s kids to college,” she said at a Democratic debate in November 2015.
But some researchers have argued that certain provisions in Clinton’s plan will not have as much impact on how students pay for college as she claims. One example is her platform’s promise to “significantly cut interest rates so the government never profits from college student loans.”
Donald Trump’s Plan
Mr. Trump’s plan would give more oversight to colleges to decide whether to grant loans to a student based on their prospective major and future earnings.
“If you are going to study 16th-century French art, more power to you. I support the arts,” said Dr. Clovis, a professor at a professor at Morningside College in Iowa, who now serves as the campaign’s policy director. “But you are not going to get a job.”
Some researchers say these efforts defeat the purpose of providing government aid for students hoping to attend college in the first place, putting lenders in the positions of picking “winners and losers,” and determining destinies for young people who, like all of us, deserve a shot at the American dream. The campaign’s plan would also give private banks oversight over government-backed student loans, reversing a 2010 decision under President Obama to make the federal government the lender.
There is a substantial racial gap in who holds student loan debt. Some 54 percent of young African-American households (aged 25 to 40) have student debt, compared to 39 percent of young white households, according to a recent study.
Some advocacy groups have pushed for more transparency in how the Education Department collects debts from borrowers. In March, the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Consumer Law Center sued the department, in an attempt to learn more about how debt collection practices could impact borrowers of color.
Click here to read more on this story.
For borrowers who are struggling with student loan debt, relief options are available. Many student loan borrowers are unaware that they have rights and repayment options available to them, such as postponement of loan payments, reduction of payments or even a complete discharge of the debt. It is important you contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney who can advise you of all your options. As an experienced CPA as well as a proven bankruptcy lawyer, Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.
