Credit Archives - Page 26 of 82

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

When Debt Collectors Call Know your Rights

Posted on January 17, 2017by Admin

When a debt collector calls, it’s important to know your rights. In July, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau required debt collectors to do their “due diligence” to help ensure they are collecting on legitimate debt and put a cap on their weekly attempts to reach a consumer. The bureau also increased enforcement, bringing more than 25 cases on debt-collection tactics that deceive or abuse consumers.

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is a federal law that protects consumers against unfair collection practices, including:

Calling you repeatedly to annoy or harass you;
Trying to collect more than you owe;
Failing to send a written notice of the debt;
Threatening violence, using profanity or offensive language;
Threatening dire consequences (i.e. – lawsuits, criminal prosecution, wage garnishment, jail time, permanently ruining your credit);
Calling you before 8 a.m. or after 9 p.m.;
Revealing debt to third parties (i.e. – family, neighbors, friends, co-workers, etc.);
Contacting you at your work, after you have requested them to stop;
Failing to verify disputed debts;
Ignoring cease communication requests.

It is important that consumers verify everything when it comes to a debt they may (or may not) owe. In a recent CFPB survey, half of Americans contacted about a debt in the past year said they were given inaccurate information about what they owed. Debt collectors are legally required to follow up their phone call with a written notice detailing the debt.

Understand that just because someone is calling to collect a debt, does not mean you should pay it right away. It is always important to verify. The collection attempt could be for a so-called zombie debt that is past the statute of limitation or a debt collection scam.

If you do in fact owe the debt, make sure and take notes. Write down every name and employee number you speak with, including the agency, the number they called, the time of the call, etc. Take notes on what was said. This detailed record keeping can prove helpful if you need to file a complaint about the debt collector’s behavior in the future.

If you are in financial crisis and considering filing for bankruptcy, contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney who can advise you of all your options. As an experienced CPA as well as a proven bankruptcy lawyer, Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys’ help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Related Resources:

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/12/know-your-rights-when-a-debt-collector-calls.html

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

More Consumers Report Debt Collectors are Denying Requests for them to STOP Calling

Posted on January 16, 2017by Admin

A shocking three out of four consumers reported that debt collectors ignored their requests to stop calling, according to a recent survey by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The survey also revealed that consumers felt threatened by debt collectors, were contacted late at night and early in the morning and the debt collectors oftentimes used false information- all violations of The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

The survey examined a sample of consumers drawn from credit-reporting records about their experiences with debt collectors. More than 1 in 4 consumers contacted by a creditor or debt collector felt threatened, 3 out of 4 consumers who asked collectors to stop contacting them said they refused to do so. More than a third said debt collectors called between 9 p.m. and 8 a.m., according to the survey.

In addition, more than half reported a mistake in the debt, such as an incorrect amount, a debt not owed or a debt owed by a family member. The frequency of calls was also excessive- 17% said they received eight or more calls in a single week.

Consumers are protected from these predatory and unfair practices by The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act– but only if they exercise their rights. The law’s consumer protections include:

Communication: Consumers can tell debt collectors how and when to contact them- including telling them to stop contacting them entirely.

Harassment and abuse: Debt collectors cannot use abusive language, threaten violence or repeatedly call and harass them.

Truthfulness: Debt collectors must be honest about the amount of the debt, whether it is past the statute of limitations for lawsuits and cannot misrepresent themselves.

Debt validation: Consumers must receive a validation letter within five days of the first contact with information about the amount owed, the original creditor seeking payment and their rights on disputing the debt.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief

Medical Debt Collection Firms Ordered to Pay $577K for Threatening Consumers

Posted on January 12, 2017by Admin

Two medical debt collection firms must refund hundreds of thousands of dollars after they were caught falsely claiming there were attorneys involved in the collection actions. Two Oklahoma-based law firms, both named Works and Lentz, misled consumers by exaggerating the extent to which actual “lawyers” were involved in the collection attempts.

The companies involved in the case attempt to make collections on 700,000 accounts annually, collecting medical debt on behalf of hospitals, doctors, and other healthcare providers. From January 2012 to August 2016, every letter sent to the alleged debtors was printed on the firm’s letterhead, giving the impression that a legal action was pending.

Approximately one month after the letter was sent out; Works and Lentz assigned the account to a manager who contacted the debtor, representing themselves as a law firm.

In addition, when consumers called the firm back, they were greeted with a message stating, “You have reached Works & Lentz, Attorneys at Law.” The letters sent out to consumers ended with a computerized signature of an individual attorney with the title, “Attorney at Law.” The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau alleges that in most cases there was never an attorney who reviewed the collection accounts.

As specified in The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, it is illegal for firms to use false, deceptive or misleading representations or means to collect a debt, including using false implication that any individual is an attorney or that communications are from an attorney when they are not. This law was designed to protect consumers and help prevent creditor abuse and harassment.

In addition to misrepresenting that they are attorneys, the CFPB alleges that employees of Works and Lentz provided information to credit reporting agencies related to consumers’ debts without verifying the information was correct.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Student Victims Seek to Become Creditors in ITT’s Bankruptcy

Posted on January 9, 2017by Admin

Five former ITT students have taken matters into their own hands by petitioning a federal bankruptcy court to consider student loan forgiveness as part of the school’s liquidation. The now defunct Corinthian Colleges or ITT Educational Services left students with worthless degrees and mountains of student loan debt. Because tax payers backed most of these loans, the Department of Education has been reluctant to forgive them.

For years federal regulators allowed ITT schools to keep operating, even though they were well aware of the company’s questionable practices. For example, ITT had been under investigation by the Education Department since 2014, and state regulators had accused it of misleading students about the quality of its programs and their job potential upon graduation.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau filed a lawsuit against ITT nearly three years ago, accusing the chain of predatory student lending. But even with all of this evidence it hasn’t helped former students of the college discharge their student loan debt.

ITT filed for bankruptcy last year after the Education Department cut off the school’s access to federal student aid. At the time, the company operated 137 campuses in 39 states. The company was successful for years, thanks to the revenues from federal student aid. Over the past 10 years, ITT students took on over $7 billion in debt; roughly $1 billion were private loans.

In a first of its kind approach, student loan borrowers will be at the table, not just banks and regulatory agencies fighting over ITT’s assets. They in fact contributed to the creation of assets at ITT. The five former ITT students involved in the suit are seeking to establish themselves and other former ITT students as creditors in the company’s bankruptcy. Typically a company’s creditors are people or entities to whom it owes money.

ITT reported assets of $389 million and liabilities of $1.1 billion to the bankruptcy court. The company had also deposited $94 million in escrowed funds with the Education Department before it collapsed. That money could go toward some loan forgiveness.

The company’s assets include almost $80 million owed by ITT students who were enrolled at the time of the bankruptcy filing or who had withdrawn funds within the previous 90 days. Some of the $80 million is likely from students who never even had the opportunity to attend a class because of the school’s collapse.

The lawyers fighting on behalf of the students hope the judge will make a legal finding that ITT violated state consumer protection laws. This would make it easier for the students to get their loans canceled by the Department of Education. The lawyers in the case are also requesting that the five students’ claims be asserted on behalf of all former ITT students.

Click here to read more on this story.

For borrowers who are struggling with student loan debt, relief options are available. Many student loan borrowers are unaware that they have rights and repayment options available to them, such as postponement of loan payments, reduction of payments or even a complete discharge of the debt. It is important you contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney who can advise you of all your options. As an experienced CPA as well as a proven bankruptcy lawyer, Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Foreclosures, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

When Shared Bills Outlast Your Relationship

Posted on January 6, 2017by Admin

Between 1993 and 2005, married couples were legally allowed to consolidate their student loan debts. In 2005 the federal government stopped allowing joint consolidation loans, however, thousands of couples who have since gone through divorce have been stuck with their former spouses’ student loan debts.

The Boston Globe reported an instance where a woman consolidated her student loans with her husband’s in order to get a lower interest rate. At the time, she owed approximately $4,000 and he owed $19,000. When the couple divorced four years later, the woman was stuck with the entire joint debt that had reached over $30,000. After fighting it in court, she was told it could not be split and since her former husband did not have a job at the time, she was ultimately responsible. As a result, she lost her home to foreclosure, declared bankruptcy and had her paycheck and tax returns garnished.

Unfortunately, this is not uncommon for couples who consolidated debt during their marriage and later divorced. The U.S. Department of Education says federal law does not allow the old loans to be split, even in cases involving domestic violence. Joint borrowers also cannot apply for income-based repayment plans unless both parties submit financial information.

Borrowers facing “unique circumstances, such as domestic violence,” are encouraged to contact the Federal Student Aid Ombudsman to explore options.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

A WIN for Bankruptcy Filers on Means Test Expense Issue

Posted on January 5, 2017by Admin

In the case Lynch v. Jackson, No. 16-1358 (4th Cir. Jan. 4, 2017), the two debtors filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy complied with Form 22A’s instructions to list their expenses using the IRS National and Local Standard amounts rather than their actual expenses, which were less.

The bankruptcy administrator moved to dismiss their case as “abusive” under section 707(b)(2)(A)(i). Section 707(b)(2) permits a debtor to take the full National and Local Standard amounts for expenses even though the debtor’s actual expenses are less. The bankruptcy court denied the motion to dismiss.

The administrator argued that Form 22A’s instructions were erroneous and that the expense deduction amounts listed in the IRS Standards represent a cap on how high an expense amount may be claimed for certain expenses, but that if the actual amount is less, the debtor must use the lesser amount.

The Fourth Circuit found the answer in the plain language of the statute: “[t]he debtor’s monthly expenses shall be the debtor’s applicable monthly expense amounts specified under the National Standards and Local Standards. 11 U.S.C. § 707(b)(2)(A)(ii)(I).”

The fact that Congress used the word “actual” elsewhere in the same statute indicates that it made a distinction between applicable and actual. The court also recognized how outlandish it was to punish a frugal debtor should the bankruptcy administrator’s interpretation of the statute be accepted.

Click here to read more on this case.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

The U.S. States that Struggle the Most with Credit Card Debt

Posted on January 4, 2017by Admin

When it comes to managing debt, the Sun Belt states are struggling more than others: Florida, Georgia, Texas and New Mexico have the heaviest credit card debt burdens in the nation, according to CreditCards.com.

The Southern states struggled more with low incomes than high debts. For example, Florida’s average credit card debt per bank cardholder ranks 18 among 50 states, but its median income ranks 41. It would take a typical Florida cardholder nearly 13 years to pay off the state’s average credit card debt of $5,603 and they would pay more than $3,600 in interest.

Here are the states with the highest amount of credit card debt burdens, ranked by the number of months it would take to pay off the debt if 15 percent of their gross monthly income went towards payments.

Florida

Average credit card balance: $5,603

Median earnings: $28,381

Months to pay off: 18

Interest to pay off: $678

Texas

Average credit card balance: $6,009

Median earnings: $31,038

Months to pay off: 18

Interest to pay off: $712

Georgia

Average credit card balance: $5,953

Median earnings: $30,284

Months to pay off: 18

Interest to pay off: $716

New Mexico

Average credit card balance: $5,615

Median earnings: $26,244

Months to pay off: 20

Interest to pay off: $743

Alaska

Average credit card balance: $7,552

Median earnings: $35,552

Months to pay off: 20

Interest to pay off: $992

Related Resources:

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/22/the-us-states-that-carry-the-heaviest-card-debt-burdens.html

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Select Portfolio Servicing Accused of Violating Telephone Harassment Law

Posted on January 3, 2017by Admin

Debt collector, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., is being sued for violating telephone harassment statutes. A consumer filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida alleging that the debt collector called his cell phone hundreds of times in an attempt to collect a debt. The plaintiff alleges he suffered damages when he received more than 350 collection calls after he demanded the company stop contacting him.

Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. allegedly used an automatic telephone dialing system to contact the plaintiff in this case. The plaintiff is requesting a trial by jury, $1,000 in statutory damages, actual damages, all attorney fees paid, and any additional relief the court deems appropriate.

Click here to read more on this story.

Click here to learn more about the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), designed to help prevent creditor abuse and harassment.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Student Loan Borrowers Increasingly Turning to Bankruptcy to Alleviate Debt

Posted on January 2, 2017by Admin

Those struggling with student loan debt often do not see a way out. The stress of monthly payments is causing more graduates to put off things like marriage and buying a home. However, a new trend is helping alleviate the pressure: filing for bankruptcy.

Since March there have been a number of bankruptcy courts that have allowed borrowers to discharge their private student debt thanks to the vague wording in the definition of a student loan.

Bankruptcy law states that a borrower cannot discharge a loan that was for an educational benefit without proving “extreme hardship.” An increasing amount of students are arguing that their loans fall outside of this debt category because they attended a college that was not accredited or used loans that were taken out for the purposes of studying for a test like the bar exam.

This is an argument borrowers would not be expected to win, but in recent cases some judges have agreed with the borrower.

An example of this is a 37-year-old woman who filed for bankruptcy in 2014 and was able to discharge the unpaid portion of a $15,000 Citibank loan she needed to study for the bar exam. U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Carla Craig ruled that loan debt for bar exams is comparable to consumer debt and does not fall into the category of student loans that remains with a borrower even after bankruptcy.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief

Congress May End Tax Benefits on Inherited IRA’s in the New Year

Posted on December 30, 2016by Admin

Retirement accounts may soon be taking a major hit from the IRS, if Congress decides to change the rules on a tax strategy involving inherited IRAs.

Under the current rules, people who contribute to an IRA and do not end up needing the money for retirement are able to pass the account to their heirs. The money is then allowed to keep growing tax-deferred throughout the heir’s lifetime, with minimal taxes due on withdrawals.

However, the Senate Committee on Finance voted 26-0 to put an end to the ability to stretch an IRA across generations, putting trillions of dollars of legacy wealth in danger of being taxed.

Second to the home, retirement accounts are a household’s greatest source of wealth. Individuals who inherited traditional IRAs have been able to profit from one of the biggest benefits of the tax code, allowing the tax-deferred balance to continue compounding for years. The ability to transfer that wealth to second and third generations will be put in jeopardy with this legislation.

The proposed legislation comes after the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that inherited IRAs are not “retirement funds” under the bankruptcy code and are not entitled to exemption from a debtor’s bankruptcy estate.

The proposed law does not apply to surviving spouses. Surviving spouses may either roll the money over into another retirement account or spread the taxes due on the account across their lifespan.

The proposed rule would not affect Roth IRAs because taxes on those accounts have already been paid with after-tax income by the account owner. Taxes on traditional IRAs are deferred until the account owner begins making withdrawals to cover living expenses during retirement. Heirs are required to continue making annual withdrawals from the inherited account and pay taxes on those withdrawals. The new rule would dramatically speed up the pace of those withdrawals.

Click here to read more on this story.