Credit Archives - Page 36 of 82 - Kingcade Garcia McMaken, P.A. Bankruptcy Attorneys

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Top 5 Bankruptcy Myths Debunked

Posted on June 13, 2016by Admin

Filing for bankruptcy is not an easy decision and many people fear a social stigma after they file. The truth is the stigma against debtors and those who file for bankruptcy has greatly decreased over the last 20 years, and there is no indication that debtors will be treated less favorably after filing for bankruptcy. In fact, it is oftentimes easier to reestablish your credit after filing for bankruptcy, because you are essentially given a “clean slate.”

To make the bankruptcy process a little easier to understand, we have dispelled the top five bankruptcy myths.

Myth 1: You will lose everything. You may think that filing for bankruptcy means you have to give up your home, your car, your flat screen TV, and all of your assets. This is simply not true. The vast majority of Chapter 7 cases are no-asset cases, meaning the debtor gives up no possessions. This happens for two reasons. First, you can allot for basic assets, called exemptions that are necessary for day-to-day living. What you can exempt varies from state to state, so be sure to discuss exemptions with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. For possessions that are not part of the exemption, creditors likely don’t want them. Under Chapter 13, you keep all of your assets, but the value of them figures into your repayment plan.

Myth 2: You will be relieved of all your debts. Both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy will provide you relief from most of your debts. However, there are some exemptions. These include: recent taxes, child or spousal support, student loan debt, and debts that are the result of fraud you have committed.

Myth 3: Paying off your debt is a better option. Filing for bankruptcy is the biggest financial decision you will ever make, but it doesn’t mean it is a bad idea. If your debts are more than 50% of your annual income and you cannot pay them off in five years, bankruptcy is likely your best option.

Myth 4: Filing for bankruptcy means I have failed. Given that the number one reason for filing for bankruptcy is due to medical debt, this could not be less true. No surprise, the cost of medical deductibles has grown seven times faster than wages have risen. Many bankruptcies are likely the result of stagnant wages, not poor financial mismanagement. Whatever your reason is for filing, think of bankruptcy as a tool that can help you get a fresh start and take control of your finances.

Myth 5: Bankruptcy will ruin my financial future. A report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia showed that those who filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2010 had an average credit score of 538.2 on Equifax’s scale of 280 to 850. But the average score jumped to 620 by the time those bankruptcies were finalized, approximately six to eight months later. There are many ways to rebuild your credit after filing for bankruptcy. There are certain limitations you will face after filing, but taking advantage of the right financial tools can go a long way in helping you get back on the right path for your financial future.

If you are in financial crisis and considering filing for bankruptcy, contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney who can advise you of all your options. As an experienced CPA as well as a proven bankruptcy lawyer, Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys’ help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Related Resources:

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Saving-Money/2016/0613/Five-bankruptcy-myths-dispelled

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Late Night Comedian John Oliver Makes ‘TV History’ by forgiving $15 million in Medical Debt

Posted on June 10, 2016by Admin

Nearly 9,000 consumers were relieved of their medical bills courtesy of HBO host John Oliver. As part of a segment examining the unscrupulous practices of debt purchasers on his show, “Last Week Tonight,” he forgave nearly $15 million in medical debt for consumers.

Oliver’s show engages in a form of investigative comedy, this time examining an overlooked industry. Institutions often sell their debt for pennies on the dollar to companies who then attempt to collect on the bills. These companies operate with little regulation and sometimes employ abusive collection practices to intimidate people into paying.

The show set up its own company to acquire $15 million worth of debt owed to hospitals in Texas, paying only $60,000 for the debt. Oliver described how “disturbingly easy” it was to set up the company; they called it Central Asset Recovery Professionals, and incorporated it in Mississippi to make the purchase.

The consumer’s medical debts ranged from $50 to more than $250,000. Since the debts were incurred in Texas hospitals, most of the people who owe money are from the state, Oliver said.

Oliver went on to say, people who owe bills should pay them but should not be forced to choose between paying medical debts and paying for food and shelter. He said people should never use credit cards to pay off medical debts.

Click here read more on this story.

Those who have experienced illness or injury and found themselves overwhelmed with medical debt should contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney. In bankruptcy, medical bills are considered general unsecured debts just like credit cards. This means that medical bills do not receive priority treatment and can easily be discharged in bankruptcy. Bankruptcy laws were created to help people resolve overwhelming debt and gain a fresh financial start. Bankruptcy attorney Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys’ help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

The Battle for Student Loan Debt Discharge

Posted on June 8, 2016by Admin

Section 523(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code outlines a debtor’s ability to discharge student loan obligations. Under this section, student loans are presumably nondischargeable. However, there is a narrow exception if a debtor is able to show that repayment of their student loans will cause an “undue hardship.”

Two courts recently entered decisions on this issue within the same week, using the same standard for “undue hardship.” The District Court for the Middle District of Alabama and the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Idaho issued largely opposite decisions based on similar facts.

In ECMC v. Alexandra Elizabeth Acosta-Coniff, the bankruptcy court initially held that the debtor was able to meet the undue hardship threshold and discharge her $112,000 of student loans. However, on appeal, the district court reversed the decision.

The case involved a 44-year-old single mother of two who took out more than $100,000 in student loans pursuing four degrees, including two master’s degrees and a PhD in special education. As a full-time public school teacher, the debtor argued that the student loans were an undue hardship, as she was underpaid with no prospects to increase her earnings in the near future.

The court used the test for undue hardship, where the debtor must establish:

(1) That he or she cannot maintain, based on current income and expenses, a “minimal standard of living for herself and her dependents if forced to repay the loans;

(2) that additional circumstances exist indicating that this state of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion of the repayment period of the student loans; and

(3) that the debtor has made good faith efforts to repay the loans.”

The district court denied the debtor’s discharge of the loans based on the second factor, holding that the debtor did not satisfy the burden to show that there are additional circumstances preventing her from fulfilling her payment obligations. The court reasoned that the debtor chose to earn four degrees with a general understanding of the cost versus benefit analysis and her multiple degrees enabled her to seek employment on a larger pay scale.

It reasoned that the debtor’s future ability to earn extra income was a realistic possibility, negating the need to discharge her student loans.

In Elizabeth M. McDowell v. Education Credit Management Corporation, and U.S. Department of Education, the court reached the opposite decision under the Brunner analysis.

There are essentially three criteria a debtor must meet under the Brunner analysis.

Continuing to pay the loan must cause the borrower to be unable to sustain a minimum standard of living;
The borrower’s financial situation must be unlikely to change in the future;
The borrower must have made a good-faith effort to pay his or her loans.

The debtor, a 43-year-old single mother of two, owed $93,000 in student loan debt for both her undergraduate and graduate degrees. The debtor was steadily employed as a social worker, but had recently taken a $6,000 trip to South America to attend training for a career switch to photography. The debtor also financed the purchase of a motorcycle for her ex-husband.

At trial on the issue of undue hardship, her doctor testified that her health was deteriorating, and it was likely that she would be unable to work in the near future. Due to this fact, the court found her health condition to be an additional circumstance that would persist, or worsen, in the near future, satisfying the second requirement of the Brunner test.

The court recognized that the debtor made certain financial errors in the past, such as her trip to South America and the purchase of a motorcycle. However, the court held that she otherwise lived modestly while working full time. Ultimately, the court held that the debtor could discharge most of her loans, except for $10,000 which the court determined to be frivolous spending.

Click here to read more on this story.

For borrowers who are struggling with student loan debt, relief options are available. Many student loan borrowers are unaware that they have rights and repayment options available to them, such as postponement of loan payments, reduction of payments or even a complete discharge of the debt. It is important you contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney who can advise you of all your options. As an experienced CPA as well as a proven bankruptcy lawyer, Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Related Resources:

http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=8b4f44fe-0baa-4e50-b4f8-d77adda86096

http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/student-loan-ranger/2014/08/13/debunking-the-student-loan-bankruptcy-myth

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

This Bill would make Certain Forgiven Student Loan Debt Tax-Free

Posted on June 7, 2016by Admin

Owing on a debt you cannot repay is bad enough, but owing federal taxes on that debt after you no longer have to repay it is even worse. Federal tax law requires that in most cases when a loan is forgiven, the amount that is written off by the lender is taxable income to the previous debtor.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Michigan, thinks that it is unfair when the debt was incurred under fraudulent circumstances, specifically to pay for college. She has introduced a bill that would protect defrauded borrowers from being taxed on their forgiven student loan debt, called the Student Tax Relief Act.

Her bill, S. 3008, was drafted in the wake of the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. downfall and the federal investigation that followed. The Department of Education discovered that the now-defunct for-profit chain defrauded students at more than 100 schools in more than 20 states across the country.

Following the fraud finding, the Education Department told students who borrowed money to attend Corinthian classes that they would not have to repay those loans. Affected students can apply for loan forgiveness through the department’s Federal Student Aid division.

As of March 1, nearly 9,000 claims have been processed from former Corinthian students nationwide, totaling more than $132 million, according to The Education Department. The Corinthian students were also provided special tax relief on the amounts written off by the Department of Education.

Stabenow’s bill, which has 7 Democratic co-sponsors in the Senate, would give the same tax relief to students in similar educational fraud cases.

“When students take out loans to attend college, they should get a fair deal and a fair shot,” said Stabenow in announcing the introduction of the Student Tax Relief Act. “No student should be the victim of false advertising from a college that promises skills or job placement. And the last thing they deserve is to be hit with an enormous tax burden on their forgiven loans.”

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief

Bankruptcy Counseling: What it is and What to Expect

Posted on June 6, 2016by Admin

Deciding to file for bankruptcy is not an easy decision, but it may be your best option if you do not see yourself paying off your debt in five years. The federal government requires two sessions of credit counseling: pre-filing counseling to start the process and pre-discharge counseling before your debts are forgiven. These sessions will help you understand how bankruptcy works and how to avoid financial devastation in the future.

The counseling sessions do not take long to complete. Here is what you can expect.

Pre-filing counseling

Pre-filing bankruptcy counseling is the first step in the bankruptcy process. If you do not go through pre-filing counseling before submitting your case to the court, it will be thrown out.

In addition to being an educational course to help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of going through bankruptcy, pre-filing counseling presents alternatives such as debt management to help you determine if bankruptcy is the best way to resolve your debt. Upon completion of the pre-filing session, you will receive a certificate of completion valid for 180 days. You will need that certificate if you decide to file for bankruptcy.

Pre-discharge counseling

Pre-discharge counseling is the final step before the court finalizes your bankruptcy and discharges your debts. This counseling offers valuable financial education to help you manage your finances in the future. It focuses on your income, expenses and strategies to help you save money.

This class covers much of the same ground as the pre-filing session but with a focus on increasing your financial literacy. You will cover topics such as understanding your credit score, living on a budget and avoiding future financial risk. You will receive a certificate upon completion that you will need to present before the court before your debts can be discharged.

Before going into either session, gather documents that outline your income, expenses and debt to expedite the process. Expect each session to take between 90 minutes and two hours.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Federal Suit would take Google’s Payday lending crackdown a step further

Posted on June 3, 2016by Admin

Google has announced that beginning in July, it will stop selling ads to payday lenders and other companies in the business of short-term, high-interest consumer loans. Currently, when a consumer types into Google “need cash now,” the results are paid advertisements from high interest lenders and companies that refer them customers.

However, beneath those paid advertisements are search results with links to websites, such as INeedALoan.net and LocalCashNow.com that promise to connect borrowers with the same type of predatory loans. But a lawsuit filed by a federal watchdog could make it harder for those lead-generation sites to operate and may even put some out of business.

Last year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) sued T3Leads, a Burbank broker that sells consumer loan inquiries to online lenders alleging that it does little to prevent the lead-generation sites it works with from making misleading claims.

Online lenders are already worried over Google’s decision to no longer sell ads for short-term or high-interest loans — those that must be repaid within 60 days or that carry interest rates of 36% or higher. Google sources said the policy, which goes into effect July 13, will also apply to lead-generation websites that sell consumer data to those lenders.

On the typical lead-generation site, borrowers fill out an application, provide names, addresses, even Social Security and bank account numbers. Once borrowers click submit, it triggers a series of nearly instant transactions.

First, the information is usually sold by the lead-generation site to an aggregator like T3. Next, the aggregator auctions the information to lenders. Finally, the borrower is automatically redirected to the website of whichever lender won the auction.

The CFPB alleges that the process can result in consumers being tricked into taking out loans from lenders that charge the highest interest because often they are the highest bidders for the lead.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans

Local Doral Company Sued for Running a Massive Student Loan Debt Scam

Posted on June 2, 2016by Admin

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi are suing the Doral-based, Student Aid Center, for illegal business practices in the hopes of recouping some of consumers’ lost money.

The Student Aid Center, which claimed to help graduates relieve themselves of student loan debt, is now facing serious legal trouble of its own. The two owners filed for bankruptcy in February, stating the company had liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.

In addition to the FTC and the State of Florida complaint, Minnesota and the District of Columbia have filed lawsuits accusing Student Aid Center of “deceptive practices.” The Minnesota lawsuit alleges one of the owner’s Instagram account frequently referenced Jordan Belfort, the money-grubbing stockbroker depicted in the Leonardo DiCaprio film The Wolf of Wall Street.) The account has since been taken down.

The owners were savvy marketers, running advertisements on social media, radio spots, Google ads promoting the tagline, “Obama Loan Forgiveness,” and even in one case, an aerial banner flying over South Beach.

The complaint brought by the FTC and the State of Florida says Student Aid Center “preyed on consumers’ anxiety about student loan debt” by falsely promising to reduce or even eliminate it.

The company demanded upfront fees in five monthly installments of $199 or more, according to the complaint- even though graduates can apply for government loan forgiveness programs free of charge. Student Aid Center went as far to tell its customers to stop paying their lenders and instead pay the company directly, the lawsuit alleges.

But although the company lured in customers by promising a 100 percent money-back guarantee, Student Aid Center later deflected those who demanded refunds by either not returning the money or returning an amount much less than what had been paid, according to the FTC.

Click here read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Can an employer check my credit?

Posted on June 1, 2016by Admin

While credit checks are not the norm in the job application process, the practice is common for jobs where candidates will be privy to sensitive information or making financial decisions.

States and local jurisdictions are increasingly regulating the use of credit reports in hiring. Eleven states limit employers’ use of credit reports, and other states are considering similar legislation.

When an employer checks your credit they are reviewing your credit report, not your score. What are they looking for? In most cases they want to see evidence that you are honest and responsible- this is not always the best indicator of either.

It is important to remember that the employer needs to ask your permission and receive written consent, before running a credit check. If your poor credit disqualifies you, the employer is required to let you know and give you a chance to respond.

Regardless of where you stand, it is a good idea to take a look at your credit report before you start a job search. Check for inaccuracies and take steps to correct them. Remember, there are three different credit bureaus—Equifax, Experian and TransUnion. You can access your FREE credit report at AnnualCreditReport.com.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans

Student Debt Relief Scams Targeting Borrowers

Posted on May 31, 2016by Admin

If you are struggling with student loan debt, you’re not alone. The FTC and the State of Florida announced lawsuits against two “alleged” student loan debt relief agencies. Consumer Assistance Project and Student Aid Center promised to get borrowers’ loans forgiven or significantly reduced, according to the FTC.

Consumer Assistance targeted borrowers online and over the phone, claiming they would get relief through government or by disputing loans. Student Aid Center used radio ads, text messages, and featured ads in search results, promoting “Obama Loan Forgiveness.”

But borrowers who paid the companies did not get their loans forgiven or even reduced. At most, the companies got borrowers’ loans put into deferment or forbearance, where loan payments are postponed, but interest still accrues.

Student Aid Center made certain situations worse by telling people to stop contacting their lenders and pay them, instead. Borrowers ended up paying thousands, but did not get the promised relief.

Student loan forgiveness programs are available in very limited circumstances. The FTC has the following new materials to help borrowers:

Student Loan Debt Relief explains how to spot a debt relief scheme, and what people struggling with student loans can do to help themselves.
Maria and Rafael Learn the Signs of a Debt Relief Scam tells the story of a couple trying to repay debt they accumulated for their daughter’s college education. It is the latest in a series of graphic novels to raise awareness about scams targeting Latin communities.
This list shows every company and individual ever banned from providing debt relief and mortgage assistance relief services by an FTC order.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Surge in Student Loan Debt Cancellation Requests

Posted on May 26, 2016by Admin

The Obama administration has received nearly 20,000 applications from Americans seeking to have their student loan debt cancelled on the grounds they were deceived by the universities they attended. The increase has led to the government forgiving tens of millions of dollars for borrowers.

Under a decade-old law, known as the “borrower defense,” borrowers are entitled to have their loans forgiven if they can prove their school used deceptive advertising and recruiting practices. This law had sat dormant for years. However, last year the Education Department, at the urging of student activists, started using the law to cancel loans taken out by former students of Corinthian Colleges. The for-profit chain was liquidated in bankruptcy last year after federal regulators accused it of running advertisements that cited false statistics on the employment status and earnings of graduates.

As of January, the agency had received about 7,500 applications for forgiveness from borrowers owing a combined $164 million. The agency continues to review applications on a case-by-case basis. It has agreed to cancel more than $27 million in debt for 3,421 borrowers, many of them former Corinthian students.

Click here to read more on this story.