Student Loans Archives - Page 8 of 31

99 Percent of Public Service Student Loan Forgiveness Applicants Rejected

Posted on May 7, 2019by Admin

According to recent U.S. Department of Education statistics, more than 99 percent of people who have applied for available public service student loan forgiveness have been rejected. As of December 31, 2018, it was reported that 65,500 total applications for the public service student loan forgiveness program had been submitted. However, of this total, 58,000 applications had been processed with the majority of them resulting in denials. An additional 7,200 applications were marked as pending.

The program’s requirements are complicated, and not well-explained to qualifying borrowers. Approval requires more than simply working in public service. The Public Service Student Loan Forgiveness Program is offered through the federal government and requires the borrower work full-time, meaning more than 30 hours per week, in an eligible federal, state or local public service job. The borrower can also work for a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, so long as the position is a full-time, eligible one. The borrower must make 120 eligible on-time payments to qualify.

Several different reasons were given for these denials. Seventy-three percent of these rejected applications were denied due to the applicant not meeting the “program’s requirements.” These requirements could mean either the borrower did not have student loans that were eligible for forgiveness, did not have qualifying employment, or did not make the 120 consecutive required qualifying student loan payments. Another 25 percent of these student loan forgiveness applications were denied because the applications were incomplete or had missing information on the employment certification form.

The report indicated that only 610 applications for student loan forgiveness had been approved and that 338 borrowers had received a collective amount of $21.1 million in public service student loan forgiveness. Less than 0.5 percent of the applications submitted were successful.

Click here to read more on this story.

For borrowers who are struggling with student loan debt, relief options are available. Many student loan borrowers are unaware that they have rights and repayment options available to them, such as postponement of loan payments, reduction of payments or even a complete discharge of the debt. There are ways to file for bankruptcy with student loan debt. It is important you contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney who can advise you of all your options. As an experienced CPA as well as a proven bankruptcy lawyer, Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade Garcia McMaken has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade Garcia McMaken website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Student Loans

ABI Releases Key Recommendations on Discharging Student Loan Debt in Bankruptcy

Posted on May 1, 2019by Admin

Student loan debt can be particularly challenging to discharge in bankruptcy. The current undue hardship standard can be difficult for most borrowers to meet. However, that doesn’t mean student loan debt is any less burdensome than other types of debt that are discharged in bankruptcy. Borrowers can spend years struggling to make payments on student loans, only to see thousands of dollars in interest and fees added to the total if they default on a payment or have to go into forbearance. Most borrowers do not see bankruptcy as being a viable option to discharge their student loan debt.

However, this may soon change thanks to the recommendations made by the American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI). How student loan debt is handled in bankruptcy is just one of issues being reviewed by ABI and discussed in the final report made by the Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy.

The ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy was created in 2016 with the mission of researching and recommending improvements to the country’s current bankruptcy system. The changes include amendments to the Bankruptcy Code, as well as administrative rules, recommendations on interpreting the current bankruptcy law, and modifications to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

When the Commission began its work, they asked for input on what bankruptcy issues should be reviewed. Student loan debt was one of the issues that received the most recommendations. With consumers holding an estimated $1.5 trillion in student debt, the fact that this issue is an area of focus by the ABI Commission on Consumer Bankruptcy is not surprising. It is also estimated that over 40 million American consumers currently carry some amount of student loan debt.

Bankruptcy is intended to serve as a fresh start for consumers struggling financially, but the tests currently used by bankruptcy courts to determine whether the filer’s student loan debt should be partially or completely discharged makes this fresh start an impossibility for many.

The Commission recommended that the current bankruptcy law be re-written so that student loan borrowers who are no longer able to continue paying on their debts and default on their student loans be allowed to receive this fresh start.

Currently, the law requires that the borrower prove an undue hardship before being able to discharge the debt. However, what qualifies as a hardship is not defined legally. Courts have used various tests to determine what qualifies as a hardship, but no uniform test exists. The Commission recommended that a student loan debt be allowed to be discharged unless certain factors exist including: 1) the debt was made, insured or guaranteed by a government agency; 2) the debt was incurred for the borrower’s own education, and 3) the student loan first became payable less than seven years before the bankruptcy petition was filed.

The recommendations made by the Commission would have the effect of eliminating the protection private student lenders have previously enjoyed. Additionally, it would make it possible for individuals who took loans out on behalf of someone else to get out of the debt, including parents who co-signed loans for their children. These recommendations are being submitted to Congress, and it is hoped that lawmakers will take this report and use it to propel change to the current bankruptcy system.

Click here to read more on this story.

Related Resource:

https://consumercommission.abi.org/

Bankruptcy Law, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

How the Student Loan Debt Crisis Got So Bad

Posted on April 9, 2019by Admin

Student loan debt is a problem that plagues over 40 million Americans. It is currently estimated that more than $1.5 trillion is owed in student loan debt nationwide. With an outstanding balance this large, many are asking: how did this problem get so out of hand?

Former Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Ombudsman and the current Executive Director of the Student Borrower Protection Center, Seth Frotman, recently gave an interview to Yahoo Finance where he provided his input on the situation. Since he was on the front lines when it came to government protection of student borrowers, Frotman believes that loan balances have gotten out of hand as a result of decades of predatory lending and weak government regulation over the student loan sector.

Frotman resigned from the CFPB in August 2018 in a letter where he accused the current administration of not protecting student borrowers from predatory lending and other similar practices. In his letter, Frotman accused the administration of not enforcing lending violations and protecting bad lenders in the process.

In the interview, Frotman gave some background as to how student loans have been handled in past decades. For the most part, student loans are issued by banks or federally-backed private lenders. Given the fact that someone asking for a student loan normally does not have an extensive credit history, it is important that these borrowers are protected when taking out money to attend college.

However, over time, the cost of going to college began to skyrocket. It is estimated that the average cost of tuition for a private non-profit four-year university is $35,830, which is twice what a college student would have paid two decades ago. As tuition costs went up, the loans students had to take on to pay for going to college also went up. The result of this increase attracted other less-than-reputable lenders who saw a huge money-making opportunity.

In Frotman’s words “no one was minding the store” when it came to student lending, as more and more companies joined the student lending game. Unfortunately, the 2008 recession caused even more problems. Congress ended up bailing out the banks’ student loan arms hundreds of billion dollars to ensure that students still had access to loans to attend college.

As a result, however, the government ended up owning a great deal of student loan debt. The government ended up entering contracts with banks and loan providers that serviced student loans, including Navient, Nelnet, Great Lakes and FedLoan. These contracts are expected to expire this summer, leaving many, including Frotman, to worry about what will happen next. The current Education Secretary, Betsy DeVos, has mentioned that she would consider an exclusive contract to just one company to service billions of dollars of existing student loans, which has raised a lot of opposition. However, until a decision is made, it is expected that the existing contracts will be extended.

Lenders are required to follow a series of rules and regulations when it comes to providing student loans, but it was discovered recently by a government watchdog that the Department of Education was not holding loan providers accountable under these regulations. Some of these violations included misleading borrowers into putting their loans in forbearance, putting delinquent accounts into forbearance without borrower approval, and generally not holding servicers accountable.

The situation is expected to get even worse. It is estimated, as of February 2019, that 11.5 percent of student loans are at least 90 days delinquent or are in default. It is possible this number underestimates just how many borrowers are behind on their payments, including those in forbearance or loans that are deferred, which means the number of loans that are past-due could be even higher.

Click here to read more on this story.

Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Student Loan Debt and College Costs Set to Increase with Trump’s New Budget Proposal

Posted on April 3, 2019by Admin

President Trump’s proposed budget could have some serious consequences for individuals carrying student loan debt. In fact, student loan debt seems to be a major part of the President’s proposed fiscal year 2020 federal budget, which was sent to Congress on Monday.

The proposed fiscal year 2020 budget includes various cuts and changes to federal student loan programs. In addition, the budget includes a 10 percent total decrease in Department of Education Funding. The total cuts end up being $62 billion, which is $7.1 billion less than what the DOE had allotted in funds for the 2019 fiscal year.

Many financial experts worry what these changes could mean for student loan costs, as well as college expenses. Not only would the budget proposal raise costs for attending college, it could also result in a significant increase when it comes to student loan debt.

An estimated $1.5 trillion in student loan debt is owed nationwide. However, it is estimated that this new budget could force borrowers to pay an additional $207 billion more on their student loan debt on top of this already astronomical amount.

One part of the proposed budget eliminates the subsidized student loan program. Students who are enrolled in school could discover that they are accruing interest on their loans even though they are still enrolled in school. Currently, if a student is enrolled in school, they do not accrue interest on their loans, which means these students could be in for a rude awakening if the proposals go through. Adding interest while students are attending college could increase the cost of attending college or even graduate school for these students.

President Trump’s budget proposal also eliminates the public service loan forgiveness program, which has been law since the President George W. Bush era. Many graduates utilize this program as a means of eliminating their student loan debt by entering the public sector and taking jobs as prosecutors, public defenders, legal aid attorneys, police officers, firefighters and civil servants. Taking a lower paying job with the end goal of eliminating tens of thousands in student loan debt pales in comparison to the alternative of being stuck with student loan debt for decades. However, this option may no longer be available for these borrowers if the budget is approved.

The proposed budget does call for quicker loan forgiveness with respect to undergraduate student loans. The budget proposal includes the possibility of student loan debt being forgiven after 15 years instead of the current 20-year term.

Click HERE to read more.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

President Trump Plans to End Student Loan Debt Forgiveness Program

Posted on March 13, 2019by Admin

The White House has released President Trump’s budget proposal for 2020, and many of the cuts take aim at the student loan debt crisis. Here are some of the specific proposals, which could affect borrowers’ ability to pay off their student loan debt.

The end to public service loan forgiveness. According to Trump’s proposed budget, the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program would be eliminated. The effects could adversely impact members of the U.S. Armed Forces, police officers, firefighters, first responders, prosecutors, public defenders, and other public servants.
A change to federal student loan repayment. The number of income-driven repayment plans would be reduced to just one. Current plans, such as PAYE and REPAYE, allow borrowers to repay their federal student loans based on income, family size and additional factors, and can result in student loan forgiveness. The changes would favor undergraduate borrowers who typically earn less than graduate school student loan borrowers. Monthly student loan payments would be capped at 12.5% of income and after 15 years of monthly payments, any remaining student loan debt would be forgiven. This is five years earlier then the current income-driven repayment options. Graduate student loan borrowers would see the opposite effect – a five year increase to student loan debt repayment before their loans are forgiven.
The end to subsidized student loans. Subsidized student loans has traditionally meant that the government pays the interest costs on federal student loans while borrowers are enrolled in school. The rationale behind eliminating these type loans is to save the federal government money by collecting additional interest. This could result in the cost of a higher education being that much more expensive due to additional interest costs.

Click HERE to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Student Loan Changes on the Horizon

Posted on March 11, 2019by Admin

An estimated $1.5 trillion is owed in student loan debt nationwide, which makes it a pressing issue in the current political arena. In fact, student loan debt is expected to be a major issue in the upcoming election given the fact that more than 40 million American consumers carry student loan debt. The following are some potential changes that borrowers may see in the future.

One of these proposed changes has been to radically modify the costs of attending a public university. Currently, the average student graduates from a state public university with somewhere near $35,000 in student loan debt, which stays with the borrower for quite some time following graduation. This balance goes up even more if the college is out-of-state or private. The House Democrats have recently proposed the Aim Higher Act, legislation which would increase the amount of grant-based federal aid and would also offer financial incentives to states to either reduce tuition or eliminate it altogether at state universities. The latter may seem like a pipedream, but some states, such as New York, have recently proposed laws that would offer free tuition at state universities for students who qualified under income guidelines, so long as the student commits to staying and working in New York upon graduation.

These proposals only deal with students who are getting ready to attend college. What about the others who already have student loans and are struggling to pay them? Proposals have been made to create a federal program that allows borrowers to refinance both their federal and private student loans at a lower interest rate. This possibility could make payments more reasonable for borrowers by lowering interest rates on outstanding loans. However, opponents to this idea argue that a refinancing program would only benefit higher-income earners as opposed to those groups who could benefit from them most.

Another potential change to student loans could come in the form of caps on how much interest can accrue on a loan. Borrowers normally end up paying essentially double what they took out originally by the time interest is fully paid. Many state legislators have proposed capping the amount of interest at a certain percentage of the total original principal balance, making the repayment process more feasible.

At some point, many financial experts advocate that all of the programs in the world will do nothing without addressing the total debt owed already. Student loan forgiveness or cancellation could be seen as a way of not only stimulating the economy but also freeing many from the burden of debt. Programs, such as the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, already exist, but those only apply for graduates working in specific industries. Other programs could potentially appear with the same goal in mind in the future.

Student loan advocates have been arguing for years that more oversight needs to occur for lending. States, including New York and Massachusetts, have bills that are currently pending which involve this issue, and it is highly possible more states will propose similar legislation.

Reform may also come in the bankruptcy court. Traditionally, student loans have been next to impossible to discharge in bankruptcy. The courts apply an “undue hardship” test when determining if a borrower’s loan obligations should be discharged, but no uniform test exists, leaving courts to vary in their interpretation of the law. The fact that these loans are so hard to discharge in bankruptcy is a leading reason why many people decide not to file for bankruptcy and continue struggling financially. If student loans were able to be discharged in bankruptcy, this change could open the doors to financial freedom for countless borrowers struggling with student loan debt.

Please click here to read more.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Millennials Hold Over $1 Trillion in Debt

Posted on February 26, 2019by Admin

With the increase in student loan debt, it is hard to ignore the effects it is having on a particular generation. The most recent statistics reveal that “Millennials,” individuals who were born after 1982, hold more than $1 Trillion in debt – much of that being student loan debt. In fact, the amount has risen 130 percent since 2008. These figures come from the New York Federal Reserve Consumer Credit Panel and are the highest debt levels reported since before the 2007 recession.

Most students end their undergraduate careers with an average of $37,000 in student loan debt. If they choose to move onto graduate studies, that debt can reach six figures before the student is done. Following graduation, most of these students are struggling to meet basic living expenses on top of meeting their monthly student loan payments.

The student loan debt burden has also impacted millennials’ ability to purchase a home. Consumer debt is reported at a record high of $13.5 trillion. Mortgage debt constitutes most consumer debt nationwide, but that is not the case for the millennial generation. Since 2009, mortgage debt increased by only 3.2 percent while student loan debt jumped 102 percent.

Overall, student loans make up the second largest category of consumer debt. Credit cards and auto loans follow. At the end of 2018, car loans made up the third largest percentage of debt in the U.S., followed by credit card debt.

If a borrower is not able to maintain payments on his or her student loan debt, the damage that results to that person’s credit can be significant, and this hit to a credit score can seriously hurt the person’s chances of obtaining a mortgage down the road. This fact could be another reason why fewer millennials are taking out mortgages.

Student loan debt is different from other types of debt. It is currently estimated that somewhere around 40 percent of all student loan borrowers will default at some point on their student loans. Many different mistakes can be made when it comes to student loan repayment. If you believe you qualify for student loan debt relief, speak with an experienced bankruptcy attorney about your options.

Click here to read more on this story.

Related Resources:

https://www.badcredit.org/average-student-loan-debt/

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans

Homeownership Out of Reach for 400,000 Young Families Burdened with Student Loan Debt

Posted on January 23, 2019by Admin

Student loan debt presents a major problem for many different reasons, but for 400,000 Americans in their 20s and 30s, student loan debt is now preventing them from purchasing a home. These numbers come from a new report released from the Federal Reserve, which has shown an 8.8 percentage decrease in homeownership for individuals in their 20s and 30s between the years 2005 and 2014.

Between the years 1989 and 2016, the amount of American families that carried student loan balances went from 8.9 percent to 22.4 percent according to information produced by the Fed’s Survey of Consumer Finances. For Floridians, the amount of student loan debt incurred every year has consistently been going up, as well. According to this research, the average family has a student loan debt balance of up to $19,000. The problem is what is going to happen to these young borrowers after they enter the workforce and wish to make a big purchase, such as buying a home? Will these individuals also be able to save up for retirement? According to the research from the Federal Reserve, approximately 3.6 percent of Americans between the ages of 65 and 74 are still paying on their student loan obligations.

While going to college and securing a college degree can benefit the borrower in many ways, such as securing a job in that person’s chosen career field with a better chance of earning a good income, this education almost always comes at a high cost. Students are graduating with loan balances well into five figures with no end in sight. If the student goes on to earn a graduate or professional degree after receiving his or her undergraduate degree, that balance can even reach six figures. Many researchers argue that tuition costs need to be decreased significantly to make college a less costly choice for students graduating high school. However, tuition costs only seem to be rising every year.

The study showed that the borrowers who have higher student loan debt early in life tended to have a lower credit score later. A lower credit score can hurt that person’s chances of getting a home, but also accessing other types of credit for a car purchase or acquiring a personal loan.

Please click here to read more.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Florida Healthcare Workers Lose License to Practice Medicine Due to Unpaid Student Loans

Posted on January 16, 2019by Admin

Student loan debt has become a crisis in America, but for many Florida borrowers, this crisis has hit close to home. Over 100 Florida healthcare workers have now lost their license to practice medicine due to their inability to repay their student loans. A recent crackdown by the state board of health was initiated in an effort to get student loan borrowers to pay back their loans.

For years, federal student loan companies have pushed states to enact laws that were tougher on borrowers who defaulted on their student loan obligations. One of the suggested penalties has been taking away professional licenses from defaulting borrowers. Florida is the only state that has begun enforcing these types of laws.

The Florida State Board of Health reported that approximately 900 healthcare workers were at risk of losing their license over the past two years. The board worked out repayment plans with the great majority of those workers, leaving 90 to 120 license suspensions since November 2016. These licenses include professional certifications for registered nurses, Certified Nursing Assistants, opticians and pharmacists.

However, now that these workers have lost their ability to earn an income, the question remains: how will they be able to pay their loan obligations? That argument is being made by area student loan attorneys. The decision to take away professional licenses for nonpayment of students is being questioned as putting a strain on employers and patients in an already short-staffed industry. Healthcare workers are already in short supply but taking away additional workers who have struggled paying their loan obligations will make the field even scarcer. Additionally, now that these workers have lost their ability to earn an income, it is more likely than not that they will end up depending on welfare benefits to survive.

Under the Florida law, the state has the power to garnish up to 100 percent of the healthcare worker’s wages before his or her license can be reinstated. Also, once the worker’s license is suspended, the only way he or she can get back the license is to pay a fine that is equal to 10 percent of the balanced owed. Critics of this law argue that it is entirely too unreasonable and makes it essentially impossible for the worker to get back on his or her feet.

It is estimated that over 10 percent of all student loan borrowers are now in default on their loan obligations. Approximately $1.2 trillion is owed nationally in student debt. Tuition costs seem to be rising every year, and the average student graduates with a large amount of debt, well up to $30,000 or higher. If the student continues on to graduate school, law school or medical school, the loan obligation can get as high as six figures. It comes as no surprise that these students, after graduation, struggle with meeting their monthly debt obligations, especially if they struggle finding employment after graduation.

The Florida law does require a 45-day written notice be issued to the borrower before his or her license is suspended. If you receive one of these notices, it is recommended you not ignore the notification but immediately contact your lender to discuss a possible repayment plan.

Click here to read more.

Related Resources:

https://marketsanity.com/florida-board-of-health-has-suspended-thousands-of-healthcare-licenses-over-defaults-on-student-loans/

Bankruptcy Law, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Arrest Made in the Latest Student Loan Debt Relief Scam

Posted on January 10, 2019by Admin

The head of a well-known alleged student loan debt relief scam is now being forced to account for his actions. Brandon Frere, the CEO of Ameritech and two other companies is accused of engaging in scams in the student debt relief business. He was arrested last week at the San Francisco International Airport.

When he was arrested, he was on his way to Cancun, Mexico, and had $3,900 cash on him, as well as five blank checks from his business, two blank checks from his personal bank account, 10 credit cards, gift cards and his Social Security card.

The claims against Frere are numerous. He is accused of withdrawing money that the company was holding in escrow for its customers, meaning the money belonged to the customers and not to the company. He is also accused of transferring millions of dollars from the company into his personal account and spending this money on cars, travel and other luxury items.

Days before Frere tried to leave the country, a judge granted a motion for preliminary injunction filed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The same day that Frere booked his Cancun ticket, he withdrew $400,000 from accounts that were associated with his companies. Of that amount, $179,000 was transferred to his personal account. The remainder was transferred to family members and lawyers. Prosecutors estimate that Frere’s companies collected somewhere up to $28 million from student loan borrowers over four years.

It is estimated that student loan debt is a staggering $1.5 trillion, held by 44 million borrowers. It is also estimated that somewhere around 40 percent of all student loan borrowers will default on their obligations at some point in time.

These types of scams are not unique. In fact, many of these companies exist, taking advantage of student loan borrowers who are in an extremely difficult situation and are desperate for relief. It is extremely important that a student loan borrower does his or her research before choosing a repayment plan or relief option. Many times, borrowers make simple mistakes, like trusting a company they should not otherwise trust, that only hurts them in the end.

Once they had the borrower’s money, the company would continue to charge the borrowers monthly fees, ranging from $49 to $99. The borrowers were under the impression that the company was making their payments to their loans, but these payments were not being made, leaving these accounts unpaid and in default.

Another illegal practice that Frere and others were accused of was encouraging their company representatives to push customers to exaggerate the size of their families to receive more favorable student loan terms.

The FTC and various state attorneys general have been hard at work on cracking down on these types of scams and illegal collection practices. The FTC claimed that Ameritech would lure student loan borrowers with mailings promising the borrowers that they were prequalified for debt-relief. The company collected fees ranging between $600 to $800 to prepare and submit documents on behalf of the borrowers who were interested in government repayment and forgiveness programs. The problem with this is that there are free services provided by the U.S. Dept. of Education that offer the same.

Click here to read more.