federal student loan debt Archives - Page 6 of 6

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Even Death does not Meet Threshold for Student Loan Debt Forgiveness

Posted on July 6, 2016by Admin

Grief stricken after her son’s unsolved murder, a New Jersey mother faced an endless list of tasks- helping the police track down his killer, cancelling his credit cards, bank accounts, cell phone and planning a funeral.

And then there were his college student loans she co-signed.

When she called about his federal loans, an administrator offered condolences and assured her the balance would be written off. However, she received a far different response from a New Jersey state agency that had also lent her son money.

“Please accept our condolences on your loss,” explained a letter from the Higher Education Student Assistance Authority of New Jersey. “After careful consideration of the information you provided, the authority has determined that your request does not meet the threshold for loan forgiveness. Monthly bill statements will continue to be sent to you.”

These loans also carry higher interest rates than similar federal programs. Most significant, New Jersey’s loans come with a hurdle that even the most predatory for-profit players cannot avoid: the power of the state.

New Jersey can garnish wages, rescind state income tax refunds, revoke professional licenses, and even confiscate lottery winnings— all without having to get court approval.

Some consumer attorneys compare it to “state-sanctioned loan-sharking, a program that is set up so that you fail.”

Like many states, New Jersey administers a student loan program designed to help students further their education in order to be competitive in today’s workforce. Where New Jersey differs with other states is the degree of difficulty in getting out from under burdensome loan payments despite extreme poverty, illness and even death.

Click here to read more on this story.

For borrowers who are struggling with student loan debt, relief options are available. Many student loan borrowers are unaware that they have rights and repayment options available to them, such as postponement of loan payments, reduction of payments or even a complete discharge of the debt. It is important you contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney who can advise you of all your options. As an experienced CPA as well as a proven bankruptcy lawyer, Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Shady College Practices could Erase Student Loan Debt

Posted on June 22, 2016by Admin

Proposed federal legislation will now make it easier for student borrowers, who have been cheated or misled by their college or university, to have their student loan debt forgiven.

The proposed rule changes announced last week by the U.S. Department of Education are part of an ongoing crackdown on the alleged abuses by for-profit colleges and universities.

Major provisions of the proposed debt-relief rule include:

An easier way to seek relief from federal student loans when a college has committed wrongdoing. The current “defense to repayment” process is complicated and subject to different rules depending on the state. It went largely unused until the collapse of Corinthian Colleges in 2015. As of today, more than 23,000 claims for student loan debt forgiveness have been filed, and the government has wiped out more than $42 million in debt for more than 2,000 borrowers so far.
Allowing group applications for debt relief in cases where there is school-wide wrongdoing. Currently, each student is required to file individually.
Requiring schools to warn current and prospective students if former students have poor loan repayment rates.
Doing more, sooner, to inform students whose schools have closed that they may qualify to have their loans forgiven.
Completely banning school agreements under which students sign away their right to sue schools and agree to participate in an arbitration process instead of notifying regulators about problems.
Requiring schools at financial risk to set aside funds, via irrevocable letters of credit, to cover the cost in case students eventually are due debt relief because the school fails to keep its promises to students. Conditions are set that would trigger the requirement (i.e. – a government entity filing a major suit against the school or the school relying too heavily on federal student loans.) Schools that activate these so called, “triggers” would be required to warn current and prospective students that they are at financial risk. Currently, when schools declare bankruptcy, taxpayers are responsible for the forgiven loans.

U.S. Education Secretary John King said, “These rules should make schools think twice,” about misleading students or engaging in risky enrollments.

U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, praised the proposed rule, which is subject to a 45-day comment period, as “a victory for students.” These protections will stop for-profit colleges from using fine print to deny students their right to a day in court.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Murphy Bill will Stop Garnishment of Social Security Benefits to Pay Student Loans

Posted on April 27, 2016by Admin

A bill has been introduced by U.S. Representative Patrick Murphy that will prevent social security benefits from being garnished to repay student loan debt. Murphy says it is a problem that needs to be addressed and believes expanding higher education opportunities and protecting Social Security benefits are key to bolstering the middle class.

In the fiscal year that ended in October, 860,000 individuals had their Social Security benefits reduced to pay for federal debts, with the federal government collecting $382 million, according to the Senate Finance Committee. This number included attempts to collect other debts besides student loans.

According to the General Accountability Office, the number of people whose Social Security benefits were reduced specifically to pay off student loan debt increased from 31,000 in 2002 to 155,000 in 2013. The numbers for those older than age 65 increased from 6,000 to 36,000 in the same period. Some of those were paying down debts incurred to educate their children through co-signing or Parent PLUS loans. In fact, people older than 65 owe $18.2 billion on student loans.

The Murphy Bill is a step in the right direction, but still falls short by failing to alleviate the debt for seniors. Consumer advocates believe the real solution is a change in the law to permit unsustainable student loan debts to be discharged in bankruptcy.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Duxbury Father Wins Student Loan Debt Relief Settlement

Posted on April 19, 2016by Admin

A federal appeals court this week has urged a bankruptcy judge to consider a settlement that would allow a Duxbury father to discharge more than $246,000 of student loan debt he borrowed to send his three children to college.

The case has generated national attention amid the growing concern about student loan debt and what it means for our nation’s economy. For the past four years, The Educational Credit Management Corp., a company hired by the US Department of Education, has vigorously fought the efforts to have the loans discharged in bankruptcy.

Four months after the US First Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in the case and urged the parties to try to settle, the company signed an agreement acknowledging that the debtor should be forgiven because he has proven that repaying the debt would pose an undue hardship. The following day, the appeals court sent the proposed settlement to the bankruptcy court. The final decision lies in the hands of the bankruptcy judge.

Most courts rely on one of two tests when defining hardship. These include: The Brunner test, which requires a borrower to show that he has made a good faith effort to repay the debt, cannot maintain a minimal standard of living for himself and his dependents if forced to repay the loan, and is facing additional circumstances that make it unlikely he will be able to pay in the future.

The second test, called the “totality of the circumstances” test, considers a debtor’s past, present, and future financial resources; living expenses; and any other facts and relevant circumstances surrounding each particular bankruptcy case. When assessing hardship, most courts require borrowers to show extraordinary circumstances, such as a serious illness, psychiatric problem, or permanent disability.

In this case, the debtor Robert Murphy lost his $165,000-a-year position as president of a Canton manufacturing company when it moved overseas in 2002, and had been unable to find another job. He depleted his retirement savings to pay bills, which included more than $61,000 that was applied to his student loan debt, which left him and his wife primarily dependent on her $13,200 teacher’s aide annual salary.

Murphy sought to discharge the $246,000 he still owed on a dozen Parent Plus loans he took out between 2001 and 2007 to send two of his children to Loyola University Maryland and a third to the University of Connecticut and Bridgewater State.

If he had it to do over again, Murphy says he would have never borrowed the money, even though he was unemployed when the government issued him the majority of the loans. Like many in his situation, he believed he would be able to find another high-paying job and repay them. He launched an exhaustive search and attributed his inability to find work to his age, a failing economy and the decrease in manufacturing jobs.

Murphy’s case was being watched by consumer advocates across the country, who hoped the appeals court would take a new look at what defines undue hardship. The settlement has the possibility to preempt a decision that could establish a precedent.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Obama Plans to Forgive $7.7 Billion in Student Loan Debt for the Permanently Disabled

Posted on April 14, 2016by Admin

The Obama administration plans to forgive $7.7 billion in federal student loan debt for nearly 400,000 permanently disabled Americans. The law states that anyone with a severe disability is eligible to have their federal student loan debt discharged.

Four years ago, the administration took steps to make the process easier by allowing people who are totally and permanently disabled use their Social Security designation to apply for a discharge, but few took advantage of the opportunity. The Department of Education is now taking it upon itself to identify eligible borrowers and guide them through the process to discharge their student loan debt.

Working with the Social Security Administration, the department has been able to identify 387,000 matches in its first review. Approximately 179,000 of those people are currently in default on their loans, putting them at risk of losing their tax refunds and having their Social Security benefits garnished.

Those Americans with disabilities have the right to student loan debt relief. This week’s announcement further extends President Obama’s Student Aid Bill of Rights, which directs federal agencies to overhaul the way Americans repay student loan debt.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Feds Shut Down Illegal Student Loan Debt Relief Company

Posted on March 17, 2016by Admin

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) filed a lawsuit last December against Student Loan Processing.US, a debt relief operation that allegedly stole millions of dollars from consumers promising to provide repayment benefits. Today, the CFPB has taken some drastic measures to put an end to this organization once and for all. It requested that a federal district court enter a final judgment and order it to shut down Student Loan Processing.US and refund customers millions of dollars.

According to the CFPB’s lawsuit, since 2011, Student Loan Processing.US (a fictitious business name of Irving Web Works, Inc.) along with its owner, allegedly marketed and advertised services to advise and assist borrowers applying for Dept. of Education federal student loan repayment programs.

The CFPB alleges that College Education Services and Student Loan Processing.US illegally tricked borrowers into paying upfront fees for these benefits. Many times the company told consumers that it was a “consultation service” for the Dept. of Education. The company even went so far as to use a logo that resembles a government seal, stamps “official business” on its mail to consumers and cites federal law prohibiting mail tampering to create the impression that its marketing material are sent or endorsed by the federal government.

The company would then charge consumers upfront enrollment fees of either 1% of their federal student loan balance or $250, whichever amount was higher. The CFPB reports that the company required borrowers to pay the entire fee before it would even mail an application to consumers.

The ruling also found in favor of the CFPB on its claims that College Education Services and Student Loan Processing.US violated the Telemarketing Sales Rule and the Dodd Frank Act’s prohibition against deceptive acts or practices by collecting payment information from customers before disclosing the total cost of the company’s services.

According to the final judgment, Student Loan Processing.US will be ordered to pay more than $8.2 million in relief and damages to customers.

For individuals struggling with student loan debt, it’s important to remember that the Department of Education provides numerous plans to borrowers with federal student loans to make payments more affordable FREE of charge.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

New York State Accepting Applications for Student Loan Debt Relief

Posted on January 8, 2016by Admin

In an effort to help ease the burden of student loan debt on its residents, New York has started accepting student loan forgiveness applications from borrowers who attended college in the state this past year.

Governor Andrew Cuomo announced the state’s “Get On Your Feet” loan forgiveness program, which allows for up to 24 months of student loan debt relief to recent college graduates. The Get On Your Feet program supplements the federal Pay As You Earn repayment program, and allows college graduates living in New York to pay nothing on their student loans the first two years out of school. The program even goes a step further by paying its residents’ student loans for a maximum of 24 payments, equal to their monthly student loan payment amount.

“With this program, we are telling recent graduates: if you invest in New York’s future, we will invest in yours,” Cuomo stated. Helping students pay for college is critical to ensuring their future success. Students struggling with student loan debt are less likely to start a small business or buy a home, and the consequences of defaulting on these loans can be devastating.

To qualify, applicants must have earned their degree from a college or university in New York no earlier than December 2014, have an adjusted gross income of less than $50,000 a year, and be enrolled in the Federal Income Based Repayment plan, Pay As You Earn.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Bankruptcy Court Determines “Income Based Repayment” Unrealistic

Posted on January 4, 2016by Admin

Another borrower has triumphed over his student loan debt, after he filed his own adversary proceeding with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court of the Western District of Missouri. The judge in this case decided the borrower’s federal student loans should be discharged tax free in bankruptcy, allowing him to save for the future and have a better life.

In his decision, the judge looked at the “totality of the circumstances” the debtor was facing and criticized the income based repayment programs offered by the Department of Education.

The struggling borrower in this case was a truck driver who had maximized his earning potential. The public records summarized his situation by saying, “The Debtor (who represented himself) is forty years old and is unmarried. He is currently employed as a delivery driver, but at times in the past, he has worked as an over-the-road truck driver. He currently earns gross regular income of $2,420 per month, plus overtime in the approximate amount of $643 per month, for a total gross monthly income of approximately $3,063 per month. After payroll deductions for taxes, a modest retirement contribution, insurance, and child support, his net take-home pay is approximately $1,183. The Debtor testified that, due to Department of Transportation limitations on hours of service, he is unable to earn any more than what he is currently earning with the overtime, even if he took a second driving job. He also testified without contradiction that he has no job skills other than as a driver.”

Chief Bankruptcy Judge Arthur Federman noted in his opinion that Income Based Repayment Programs (IBRP) are “not the magic answer to federal student loan debt.” He further went on to say, a court, “must be mindful of both the likelihood of a debtor making significant payments under the IBRP, and also of the additional hardships which may be imposed by these programs. As stated, interest and other charges would continue to accrue while the Debtor participated in IBRP, meaning that the total debt would be increasing. The overhang of such debt could well impact not only the Debtor’s access to credit over the 25-year IBRP period, but could also affect future employment opportunities and access to housing.”

Click here to read more on this story.