Foreclosure Defense Attorney Archives - Page 4 of 9

Seniors Face More Foreclosures as Reverse Mortgages “Bite Back”

Posted on May 6, 2016by Admin

Lenders who cannot work out a repayment plan with homeowners must foreclose or risk losing federal insurance. The insurance protects the lenders against loss on 600,000 reverse mortgages totaling about $146 billion in debt – almost the entire reverse market.

There is “a historic backlog” of loans with unpaid property charges, which are coming due, according to Peter Bell, president of the National Reverse Mortgage Lenders Association.

Nearly 24,000 borrowers in the U.S. received notices that their reverse became “due and payable” in the 2015 federal fiscal year ending last September, according to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Rules for new reverse mortgages, including assessments to make sure borrowers can pay property charges, were issued in the wake of the financial crisis to make the loans a sustainable way for seniors to age in place, the agency said.

Under a reverse mortgage, borrowers put up their homes as security and receive a loan either in a lump sum or in monthly payments and are allowed to defer payments on the debt until they die, move away or fail to pay property charges. They appeal to seniors who may have substantial equity in their homes but are having trouble meeting living expenses.

But five years ago, facing federal auditors’ criticism for losing millions on defaulting reverse mortgages, HUD notified lenders that they should foreclose when property charges were not paid, unless they could work out a plan for borrowers to pay them. Otherwise, the properties would no longer meet federal guidelines and FHA would refuse to insure the mortgages, leaving lenders at risk of financial loss.

Housing advocates have also heard from a number of troubled borrowers. In 2014, several borrowers sued HUD seeking to protect widows as more of them were being forced out of their homes because they were not co-borrowers with their spouses and therefore not covered by the guarantee that they could stay until they died. The suit prompted HUD to issue guidelines allowing lenders to turn over mortgages to the FHA when a sole borrower dies – getting fully paid for the debt – and allowing aged widows to stay in the home. But some housing advocates say that lenders do not have to initiate the process to have that happen, and not all of them do.

Click here to read more on this story.

Choosing the right attorney can make the difference between whether or not you can keep your home. A well-qualified Miami foreclosure defense attorney will not only help you keep your home, but they will be able to negotiate a loan that has payments you can afford. Miami foreclosure defense attorney Timothy Kingcade has helped many facing foreclosure alleviate their stress by letting them stay in their homes for at least another year, allowing them to re-organize their lives. If you have any questions on the topic of foreclosure please feel free to contact me at (305) 285-9100. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Bankruptcy Law, Foreclosures, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Miami Bankruptcy Judge Sides with Homeowner Facing Foreclosure

Posted on March 22, 2016by Admin

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Laurel Isicoff recently ruled in favor of a Miami homeowner facing foreclosure, an important decision linking bankruptcy and foreclosure cases. The 14-page ruling challenged other decisions forcing homeowners to stop fighting foreclosure on property they surrender in bankruptcy. The judge ruled that surrendered property not administered by a trustee is abandoned to the debtor, not the creditor.

“Compulsory surrender of real property collateral by a debtor to a lienholder in Chapter 7 is not supported by and indeed ignores the express provisions of the Bankruptcy Code,” Isicoff wrote. “And consequently I must disagree with my colleagues who have held otherwise.”

The case involved mortgage holder AS Theia LLC, a Miami homeowner and his Sunny Isles Beach condo. It was the latest in an ongoing debate about the meaning and consequences of house surrenders in bankruptcy court. The central question is whether homeowners who surrender their property to get bankruptcy protection must stop fighting in state court to save the same homes from foreclosure.

In a similar 2011 case, In re Failla, the judge ordered the borrowers to stop defending a pending foreclosure action. The judge acknowledged the bankruptcy law did not specify whether a surrender was to the trustee or lienholder, but found the borrowers committed fraud by agreeing to surrender in one court but fighting to keep the property in another.

The district court upheld the decision, ruling the critical question was the “legal effect of the debtor’s decision to surrender,” not whether the property went to the trustee or lienholder.

Isicoff suggested the ruling ignores a key factor: whether or not the debtors complied with the surrender by not interfering with the trustee’s administration of the property.

This is an important decision because it gives homeowners the opportunity to have their day in court and require the lenders prove their case.

Click here to read more on this story.

Credit, Foreclosures, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Refinance with HARP before Mortgage Rates Increase

Posted on March 19, 2015by Admin

The Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP) is a program that was set up in 2009 to assist struggling homeowners in refinancing their homes- reducing mortgage payments by an average of $3,000 a year. It has also allowed homeowners to pay their mortgages off faster. Taking advantage of the benefits HARP has to offer can reduce your monthly mortgage payments and pay your mortgage off in less time.

How do you know if you qualify for HARP? If your mortgage is $625,000 or less, you most likely qualify for the program. HARP was created by the Government as a way to help the economy recover from the recession. Homeowners who have refinanced through HARP have saved an average of $250 a month. But you must act NOW! These valuable benefits are set to expire at the end of this year.

Click here to read more about how to reduce your mortgage payments through HARP.

Credit, Foreclosures, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Three Red Flags of a Mortgage Rescue Scam

Posted on March 11, 2015by Admin

The housing market crash has given rise to a new type of scam known as the mortgage relief scam, which plagues on vulnerable homeowners. These “mortgage rescue” con artists prey on struggling homeowners, desperate to stay in their homes. Americans have lost millions to these mortgage relief scams in recent years. In most cases, the scam promises homeowners they will receive a new loan with better terms if they first pay a large, upfront fee. The homeowner then sends payments to the fictitious “loan modification company,” instead of paying their mortgage.

Below are three red flags of a mortgage relief scam:

1. Requires an upfront fee. The company seeks an upfront fee and promises it can get your lender to modify your loan. The Federal Trade Commission’s Mortgage Assistance Relief Services Rule makes it illegal for a company to collect fees before a homeowner receives an offer of relief and accepts it.

2. Faking legitimacy. During the company’s mortgage relief pitch, they often invoke government programs to seem legitimate.

3. Request you sign over the deed to your home. Last but not least, beware if the company asks you to sign over the deed to your house while they process your loan modification.

Click here to read more on how to spot a mortgage relief scam.

Foreclosures, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Mortgage Relief Scams BUSTED!

Posted on October 1, 2014by Admin

State and federal law enforcement agencies have brought 41 enforcement actions against scammers who prey on homeowners struggling to make their mortgage payments. “Operation Mis-modification,” has targeted a number of mortgage relief scams and charged the perpetrators behind the schemes with deceptive marketing, making false promises and pocketing illegal fees.

So how do these scammers target their victims? Some scammers sift through public foreclosure notices looking for potential targets. There’s no shortage of these. According to one market analyst, almost 700,000 homes were in some stage of foreclosure in April. Others advertise on the Internet, television and even the side of the road with signs stating, “Stop Foreclosure NOW” or “Get a Loan Modification.”

Tactics used to scam struggling borrowers include:

• Pretending to be associated with a government agency or the homeowner’s mortgage lender.
• Guaranteeing loan modifications regardless of the circumstances.
• Claiming to be a non-profit whose purpose is to educate the public about keeping their homes.
• Convincing homeowners to surrender the title to their home with a promise that they can buy it back later.

The FTC has discovered two more sophisticated schemes involving “forensic loan audits” and “mass joinder lawsuits.” In a forensic loan audit, the scammer will examine your loan documents to determine whether the lender made any errors that can be used to stall a foreclosure. In a mass joinder lawsuit, scammers who often pose as attorneys convince homeowners that they should join a lawsuit with others in similar circumstances against their lender. In both the audit and lawsuit scheme, homeowners are required to pay upfront fees and get little or nothing in return.

Below are some tips from the FTC and BBB to avoid being the victim of a mortgage relief scam:

• NEVER pay an upfront fee to get help with a mortgage / loan modification. No matter what someone tells you, it is against the law for companies that provide mortgage relief services to charge you before they give you a written offer from your lender and you have accepted that offer.

• Do not send your mortgage payment to anyone but your lender. Companies that ask you to send your mortgage payments to them while they negotiate on your behalf almost always take the money and disappear. If your lender does not receive your mortgage payments, you could lose your home.

• Do not fall for official sounding names. Most of these organizations try to make themselves sound legitimate by choosing names like the “Federal Debt Commission” or “Federal Assistance Program.” That does not mean they are affiliated with the government.

• A forensic loan audit will not prevent foreclosure. There is no evidence that forensic loan audits will help you get a loan modification or any other foreclosure relief, even if these are conducted by a licensed auditor, mortgage professional or lawyer.

• There are no guarantees. Do not do business with a company that guarantees to get you a loan modification. The law requires that companies tell you that your lender may not agree to change your loan.

Foreclosures, Timothy Kingcade Posts

BOA’s $17 Billion Mortgage Settlement Explained

Posted on September 8, 2014by Admin

Bank of America has agreed to a legal settlement with the Department of Justice to avoid prosecution for hundreds of billions of dollars in bad mortgage loans, making it the largest corporate legal settlement with the government in U.S. history. The total “on-paper” cost of the deal is reportedly as high as $17 billion. But many are calling the deal deceptive. In reality, the settlement is unlikely to cost BOA anywhere near that amount. Much of the deal will be tax deductible and half of its cost is made up of actions on behalf of homeowners that are in the bank’s best interest- not in the form of cash refunds that will cost the bank money.

So what does this settlement mean for struggling borrowers and underwater homeowners? While the details are still being worked out, the deal includes roughly $9 billion in cash payouts and $7 to $8 billion in “consumer relief” actions such as mortgage write-downs and refinancing for struggling borrowers. These consumer relief provisions do not require the bank to spend money they would not already spend in the normal course of business operations. For BOA, helping people stay in their homes and keep making payments is better for the bank’s revenue than foreclosing on struggling homeowners.

The settlement requires BOA to relax loan terms, reduce principal amounts and destroy abandoned properties that are hurting property values. Even at face value, the reported settlement is minuscule compared to the harm caused by Bank of America companies. The on-paper cost of the deal is less than 7 percent of the value of the mortgage deals Bank of America and its subsidiaries Countrywide and Merrill Lynch made before the housing crisis that have since gone bad.

Bankruptcy Law, Foreclosures, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Former Bank of America Mortgage Employee Facing Prison Time for Taking Bribes

Posted on July 24, 2014by Admin

A former Bank of America mortgage employee has been sentenced to 30 months in prison for pocketing $1.2 million in payoffs to approve the sale of distressed properties for far less than their actual value.

Kevin Lauricella, 29, who has been cooperating with investigators, pled guilty to accepting bribes and falsifying bank records. He was sentenced by U.S. District Judge Otis D. Wright II in Los Angeles this week and was ordered to repay Bank of America $5.7 million in losses and to forfeit a Thousand Oaks home acquired through payouts from the criminal scheme.

Lauricella worked for a Bank of America division that handled delinquent home loans in 2010 and early 2011. During this time, lenders were overwhelmed by defaults on underwater mortgages, creating opportunities for insiders to exploit flaws in bank systems.

The crimes involved short sales. Lauricella collected bribes from so-called “flippers” who bought homes with the intent of quickly reselling them, Katzenstein admitted. He then issued approvals for short sales that were beyond his authority to approve, with sales prices far below the fair market value.

Lauricella made false entries in Bank of America’s computer system to make it appear that higher-ups had approved the short sales, Katzenstein said. When he pleaded guilty, Lauricella admitted approving fraudulent short sales for at least nine properties.

Related Resources:

http://www.latimes.com/la-fi-mortgage-bribe-sentencing-20140721-story.html

Foreclosures, Timothy Kingcade Posts

U.S. sees Fewer Foreclosures as Banks Reclaim more Homes

Posted on May 16, 2014by Admin

A report from RealtyTrac confirms foreclosure activity across the U.S. fell 1 percent last month, as banks scheduled fewer auctions and reclaimed more homes. The most recent drop, which includes foreclosure notices, scheduled auction and bank repossessions, is 20 percent below its year-ago level. It was also the 43rd consecutive month foreclosure activity was down on an annual basis.

Bank repossessions, still down 14 percent from a year ago, were up 4 percent in April, a likely result of the state and government interventions that slowed down the foreclosure process. In total, 30,056 homes were repossessed. According to real estate experts, the rise in bank repossessions is a sign that those markets are working through the final remnants of foreclosures left over from the housing market crash.

In Florida, one in every 400 homes is facing foreclosure and continues to have the highest rate in the nation, followed by Maryland, Delaware and Indiana. A total of 49,239 homes were scheduled for a foreclosure auction last month, down 3 percent from March and 21 percent from a year ago. It was the 41st straight month in which scheduled auctions were down on a year-on-year basis.

Click here to read more on this story.

Foreclosures, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Foreclosure: Bad for your Neighbor’s Health?

Posted on May 15, 2014by Admin

According to research published in the American Heart Association Journal, Circulation, the stress associated with living near a foreclosed home increases the chance of developing high blood pressure. Foreclosures are known for decreasing the property values of neighboring homes, but new research suggests it can also affect the health of your neighbors.

The study tracked 1,750 Massachusetts residents from 1987 through 2008 and found that each foreclosure within 100 meters of a person’s home affected their systolic blood pressure, the top number in the reading. According to the study, neighbors may be worried that foreclosures are hurting their home values or the safety of their communities, and that this anxiety can boost blood pressure. The study was controlled for age, income, education, race, sex and other factors, including whether the participants were taking blood-pressure medications. It also considered alcohol consumption and weight and found that both increased when there were foreclosures nearby.

Homes that lapse into foreclosure but are quickly purchased do not appear to lead to a rise in blood pressure, whereas homes that are seized by banks and stand vacant do, according to the study. The increase was not significant enough to present a huge health risk, but it does suggest that the housing crisis extends beyond the economy into the public health arena.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Foreclosures, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Top Five Home-Rescue Scams Revealed

Posted on May 5, 2014by Admin

A recent report, called “Foreclosure Rescue, Inc.” has documented the ongoing problems of fraudulent foreclosure rescue businesses and how these companies have plagued unsuspecting consumers following the housing crisis. The report by the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and the Loan Modification Scam Prevention Network says a database maintained by the committee has compiled more than 40,000 homeowner complaints since March 2010 from borrowers who say they have lost $90 million.

BEWARE of the following foreclosure-rescue scams:

1. Your modification is APPROVED! Send your payments to the following address… The homeowner is tricked into believing their lender has agreed to terms of a loan modification and is instructed to pay the “new” modified payment to the bogus company.

2. We volunteer all our hours with no payments. A purported non-profit agency contacts a homeowner, but after reviewing his or her mortgage sends the person to a law firm that the non-profit works with, which then begins collecting a fee.

3. You are eligible to join our lawsuit. Homeowners are told that they are eligible to join a lawsuit against their bank, but they have to pay an upfront fee and make monthly payments after that. The lawsuit is then never filed and the case goes nowhere.

4. Discount for military members and their families. Homeowners hesitant to pay for loan modification of foreclosure-rescue help are told they can use military discounts to get lower prices.

5. Pay us instead of your mortgage lender and we will protect you. Homeowners are told by the “foreclosure-rescue company” to make their mortgage payments to them and not their lender. Months later, they are blindsided by a foreclosure notice and out thousands of dollars.

Click here to read more on this story.