Kingcade and Garcia Archives - Page 17 of 23

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Shady College Practices could Erase Student Loan Debt

Posted on June 22, 2016by Admin

Proposed federal legislation will now make it easier for student borrowers, who have been cheated or misled by their college or university, to have their student loan debt forgiven.

The proposed rule changes announced last week by the U.S. Department of Education are part of an ongoing crackdown on the alleged abuses by for-profit colleges and universities.

Major provisions of the proposed debt-relief rule include:

An easier way to seek relief from federal student loans when a college has committed wrongdoing. The current “defense to repayment” process is complicated and subject to different rules depending on the state. It went largely unused until the collapse of Corinthian Colleges in 2015. As of today, more than 23,000 claims for student loan debt forgiveness have been filed, and the government has wiped out more than $42 million in debt for more than 2,000 borrowers so far.
Allowing group applications for debt relief in cases where there is school-wide wrongdoing. Currently, each student is required to file individually.
Requiring schools to warn current and prospective students if former students have poor loan repayment rates.
Doing more, sooner, to inform students whose schools have closed that they may qualify to have their loans forgiven.
Completely banning school agreements under which students sign away their right to sue schools and agree to participate in an arbitration process instead of notifying regulators about problems.
Requiring schools at financial risk to set aside funds, via irrevocable letters of credit, to cover the cost in case students eventually are due debt relief because the school fails to keep its promises to students. Conditions are set that would trigger the requirement (i.e. – a government entity filing a major suit against the school or the school relying too heavily on federal student loans.) Schools that activate these so called, “triggers” would be required to warn current and prospective students that they are at financial risk. Currently, when schools declare bankruptcy, taxpayers are responsible for the forgiven loans.

U.S. Education Secretary John King said, “These rules should make schools think twice,” about misleading students or engaging in risky enrollments.

U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, praised the proposed rule, which is subject to a 45-day comment period, as “a victory for students.” These protections will stop for-profit colleges from using fine print to deny students their right to a day in court.

Click here to read more on this story.

For borrowers who are struggling with student loan debt, relief options are available. Many student loan borrowers are unaware that they have rights and repayment options available to them, such as postponement of loan payments, reduction of payments or even a complete discharge of the debt. It is important you contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney who can advise you of all your options. As an experienced CPA as well as a proven bankruptcy lawyer, Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Former CEO of Monarch Mortgage indicted on seven counts in federal court, including bankruptcy fraud

Posted on June 21, 2016by Admin

Edward “Ted” Yoder, former CEO of Monarch Mortgage, faced a federal judge on seven charges, including bankruptcy fraud. The judge told the former bank head that he did not qualify for a court-appointed attorney, for which tax dollars would pay. Yoder was picked up by ten FBI agents, wearing a shirt that read, “Some guys have all the luck.”

Many people in Hampton Roads trusted him with their money for their most prized possession- their home. Now he is being accused of illegally handling funds. Court records accuse Yoder of hiding money, property and investments collectively valued at more than one million dollars from bankruptcy trustees.

Essentially, the case alleges when Yoder filed for bankruptcy, he concealed some of his assets by hiding them in another person’s account.

Yoder’s co-conspirator, Susan Spearman, a woman who has already pled guilty in federal court, must cooperate in any additional grand juries or trials. According to court records, Yoder owned shares of SIRIUS stock, valued at about $350,000. On October 5, 2012, Yoder had those shares sold and netted $339,660.19. Right after that, the U.S. attorney says Yoder transferred most of that money to the woman who aided him: Susan Spearman.

Two months later for the purpose of “concealing the scheme,” Yoder filed for bankruptcy. The court documents said he “never disclosed the sale of the stock or the transfer to Spearman in his bankruptcy case.” In addition, during this time as alleged in the statement of facts, Yoder told Spearman to transfer the money back to him.

Yoder maintains his innocence and has been a fixture on the Hampton Roads financial circuit for decades. Some wonder if this will result in implications for the financial industry.

Yoder is expected back in court for his arraignment on June 22, 2016.

This should come as a warning to anyone who plans to hide assets from the bankruptcy court. Bankruptcy trustees are experts at finding undisclosed cash, property, vehicles, boats, jewelry, antiques, and collectibles. If you are caught trying to hide assets, the consequences are big. Your discharge will be denied, and you will be unable to discharge the debts you listed in a subsequent bankruptcy filing. In addition, the potential penalty for bankruptcy crimes includes fines and imprisonment of up to five years.

Click here to read more on this story.

If you are in financial crisis and considering filing for bankruptcy, contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney who can advise you of all your options. As an experienced CPA as well as a proven bankruptcy lawyer, Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys’ help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans

Obama Administration Unveils NEW Student Loan Forgiveness Program

Posted on June 17, 2016by Admin

This week, the Obama administration announced new guidelines for the forgiveness of certain student loans. The program would forgive student loan debt for those borrowers who were the victims of scams perpetrated by for-profit colleges that used fraudulent or illegal practices to convince students to enroll. While there are already federal laws in place for this, these new guidelines would make it easier to apply for this type of forgiveness.

If finalized, the new program would go into effect in July 2017. Under the new plan, borrowers would be able to ask for debt forgiveness if they can prove one of the following:

The school had a court judgement against it;
The school breached their contract with the student;
The school made a “substantial misrepresentation” about their offerings, graduate job prospects or the debt the student would accrue.

Under the new proposal, students would be able to request debt forgiveness up to six years following their discovery of the school’s wrongdoing, an increase from the current two-year limit.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Survey Reveals Student Loan Debt Hurting the Housing Market

Posted on June 15, 2016by Admin

Approximately three-quarters of people who have student loan debt say it is hindering them from purchasing a home, according to a recent survey. Although a college degree increases a person’s chances of obtaining a good job and a secure future, the survey found that many would-be homeowners are increasingly burdened by student loan debt.

Seventy-one percent of those surveyed said their student loan debt is delaying them from buying a home. More than half said they expect that delay to last longer than five years.

With 43 million Americans carrying nearly $1.3 trillion in student debt, the burden is affecting all parts of the economy. The home ownership rate among those 35-and-younger has declined from 44 percent at the height of the housing boom to 34 percent today.

Forty-three percent of those surveyed carried between $10,001 and $40,000 in student loan debt, while 38 percent owed $50,000 or more. The most common debt range was between $20,000 and $30,000.

As a result of their student loan debt, 69 percent of borrowers said they did not feel financially secure enough to buy a home, while 80 percent said they cannot save up enough for a down payment. This is not only affecting first-time home buyers, but also “move-up” buyers. A third of those surveyed who are current homeowners said they cannot afford to sell their home and purchase another because of their student loan debt.

Among the reasons cited were the expense of moving and upgrading to a new home, credit problems caused by student loan debt and owing more than their home is worth because student loan debt has limited their ability to pay more than the minimum on their mortgage payment.

The 33-question survey was sent to 75,000 student borrowers, of which 3,230 responded. Among the respondents, 67 percent attended a four-year college and 27 percent attended a graduate/post-graduate school. Two-thirds went to a public institution. Seventy-one percent are employed full time while 14 percent are part-time but seeking full-time employment, according to the National Association of Realtors and American Student Assistance, who conducted the survey.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Top 5 Bankruptcy Myths Debunked

Posted on June 13, 2016by Admin

Filing for bankruptcy is not an easy decision and many people fear a social stigma after they file. The truth is the stigma against debtors and those who file for bankruptcy has greatly decreased over the last 20 years, and there is no indication that debtors will be treated less favorably after filing for bankruptcy. In fact, it is oftentimes easier to reestablish your credit after filing for bankruptcy, because you are essentially given a “clean slate.”

To make the bankruptcy process a little easier to understand, we have dispelled the top five bankruptcy myths.

Myth 1: You will lose everything. You may think that filing for bankruptcy means you have to give up your home, your car, your flat screen TV, and all of your assets. This is simply not true. The vast majority of Chapter 7 cases are no-asset cases, meaning the debtor gives up no possessions. This happens for two reasons. First, you can allot for basic assets, called exemptions that are necessary for day-to-day living. What you can exempt varies from state to state, so be sure to discuss exemptions with an experienced bankruptcy attorney. For possessions that are not part of the exemption, creditors likely don’t want them. Under Chapter 13, you keep all of your assets, but the value of them figures into your repayment plan.

Myth 2: You will be relieved of all your debts. Both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy will provide you relief from most of your debts. However, there are some exemptions. These include: recent taxes, child or spousal support, student loan debt, and debts that are the result of fraud you have committed.

Myth 3: Paying off your debt is a better option. Filing for bankruptcy is the biggest financial decision you will ever make, but it doesn’t mean it is a bad idea. If your debts are more than 50% of your annual income and you cannot pay them off in five years, bankruptcy is likely your best option.

Myth 4: Filing for bankruptcy means I have failed. Given that the number one reason for filing for bankruptcy is due to medical debt, this could not be less true. No surprise, the cost of medical deductibles has grown seven times faster than wages have risen. Many bankruptcies are likely the result of stagnant wages, not poor financial mismanagement. Whatever your reason is for filing, think of bankruptcy as a tool that can help you get a fresh start and take control of your finances.

Myth 5: Bankruptcy will ruin my financial future. A report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia showed that those who filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2010 had an average credit score of 538.2 on Equifax’s scale of 280 to 850. But the average score jumped to 620 by the time those bankruptcies were finalized, approximately six to eight months later. There are many ways to rebuild your credit after filing for bankruptcy. There are certain limitations you will face after filing, but taking advantage of the right financial tools can go a long way in helping you get back on the right path for your financial future.

Related Resources:

http://www.csmonitor.com/Business/Saving-Money/2016/0613/Five-bankruptcy-myths-dispelled

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Late Night Comedian John Oliver Makes ‘TV History’ by forgiving $15 million in Medical Debt

Posted on June 10, 2016by Admin

Nearly 9,000 consumers were relieved of their medical bills courtesy of HBO host John Oliver. As part of a segment examining the unscrupulous practices of debt purchasers on his show, “Last Week Tonight,” he forgave nearly $15 million in medical debt for consumers.

Oliver’s show engages in a form of investigative comedy, this time examining an overlooked industry. Institutions often sell their debt for pennies on the dollar to companies who then attempt to collect on the bills. These companies operate with little regulation and sometimes employ abusive collection practices to intimidate people into paying.

The show set up its own company to acquire $15 million worth of debt owed to hospitals in Texas, paying only $60,000 for the debt. Oliver described how “disturbingly easy” it was to set up the company; they called it Central Asset Recovery Professionals, and incorporated it in Mississippi to make the purchase.

The consumer’s medical debts ranged from $50 to more than $250,000. Since the debts were incurred in Texas hospitals, most of the people who owe money are from the state, Oliver said.

Oliver went on to say, people who owe bills should pay them but should not be forced to choose between paying medical debts and paying for food and shelter. He said people should never use credit cards to pay off medical debts.

Click here read more on this story.

Those who have experienced illness or injury and found themselves overwhelmed with medical debt should contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney. In bankruptcy, medical bills are considered general unsecured debts just like credit cards. This means that medical bills do not receive priority treatment and can easily be discharged in bankruptcy. Bankruptcy laws were created to help people resolve overwhelming debt and gain a fresh financial start. Bankruptcy attorney Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys’ help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Foreclosures, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Zombie Foreclosures: What Homeowners Need to Know

Posted on June 9, 2016by Admin

If you are facing foreclosure, it’s a good idea to not move out of your home too quickly- you could be haunted by what’s called a “zombie foreclosure.” Some homeowners quickly pack up and leave after receiving a foreclosure notice because they assume the bank will take over the property immediately. However, in some cases, the bank does not always move so fast. While the bank is finishing up the foreclosure process, the home can sit vacant for months while still in the homeowner’s name.

A zombie foreclosure can lead to devastating consequences for the homeowner. Oftentimes, these occur in low-income areas where the lender is not too anxious to assume the responsibility and upkeep of the property, along with paying the taxes. If squatters occupy the property or it falls into severe disrepair, the bank may ultimately wash its hands of the property.

Other times, the property may have been part of the robo-signing scandal and the foreclosure cannot be completed, the sale was never held, the paperwork was lost, or the title was never officially transferred into the new owner’s name. All of these circumstances result in the title remaining in the foreclosed homeowner’s name.

The states with the highest number of zombie properties include Florida, Illinois, New York and New Jersey, according to RealtyTrac. Zombie foreclosures can spell disaster for homeowners. Since the title is never transferred out of the foreclosed homeowner’s name, they are on the hook for certain debts and expenses like property taxes, HOA dues and maintenance fees for upkeep of the property. These debts can go unpaid for years, without the homeowner even knowing they have a legal obligation to pay them, further damaging their credit.

If you leave your property and the title is never transferred out of your name, the following things can happen (among others):

The tax collector can come and collect from you back property taxes;
The HOA may file a lawsuit to recover unpaid dues;
You can incur fines for not complying with housing codes and ordinances;
You can incur bills for yard maintenance, repairs, trash and graffiti removal, etc.

So how can homeowners avoid a zombie foreclosure? Remain in your home for as long as possible during a foreclosure. You will be less likely to become a victim of a zombie foreclosure if you stay through the entire foreclosure process and wait for an official notice to vacate before moving out. Confirm the title has been transferred out of your name. You can do this by going to the county recorder’s office where the property is located to make sure a new deed has been recorded. You can also check your local county recorder’s website. It is important to do this because in some cases the bank is not legally required to inform you that the foreclosure has stopped.

Choosing the right attorney can make the difference between whether or not you can keep your home. A well-qualified Miami foreclosure defense attorney will not only help you keep your home, but they will be able to negotiate a loan that has payments you can afford. Miami foreclosure defense attorney Timothy Kingcade has helped many facing foreclosure alleviate their stress by letting them stay in their homes for at least another year, allowing them to re-organize their lives. If you have any questions on the topic of foreclosure please feel free to contact me at (305) 285-9100. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Related Resources:

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/zombie-foreclosures.html

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

The Battle for Student Loan Debt Discharge

Posted on June 8, 2016by Admin

Section 523(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code outlines a debtor’s ability to discharge student loan obligations. Under this section, student loans are presumably nondischargeable. However, there is a narrow exception if a debtor is able to show that repayment of their student loans will cause an “undue hardship.”

Two courts recently entered decisions on this issue within the same week, using the same standard for “undue hardship.” The District Court for the Middle District of Alabama and the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Idaho issued largely opposite decisions based on similar facts.

In ECMC v. Alexandra Elizabeth Acosta-Coniff, the bankruptcy court initially held that the debtor was able to meet the undue hardship threshold and discharge her $112,000 of student loans. However, on appeal, the district court reversed the decision.

The case involved a 44-year-old single mother of two who took out more than $100,000 in student loans pursuing four degrees, including two master’s degrees and a PhD in special education. As a full-time public school teacher, the debtor argued that the student loans were an undue hardship, as she was underpaid with no prospects to increase her earnings in the near future.

The court used the test for undue hardship, where the debtor must establish:

(1) That he or she cannot maintain, based on current income and expenses, a “minimal standard of living for herself and her dependents if forced to repay the loans;

(2) that additional circumstances exist indicating that this state of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion of the repayment period of the student loans; and

(3) that the debtor has made good faith efforts to repay the loans.”

The district court denied the debtor’s discharge of the loans based on the second factor, holding that the debtor did not satisfy the burden to show that there are additional circumstances preventing her from fulfilling her payment obligations. The court reasoned that the debtor chose to earn four degrees with a general understanding of the cost versus benefit analysis and her multiple degrees enabled her to seek employment on a larger pay scale.

It reasoned that the debtor’s future ability to earn extra income was a realistic possibility, negating the need to discharge her student loans.

In Elizabeth M. McDowell v. Education Credit Management Corporation, and U.S. Department of Education, the court reached the opposite decision under the Brunner analysis.

There are essentially three criteria a debtor must meet under the Brunner analysis.

Continuing to pay the loan must cause the borrower to be unable to sustain a minimum standard of living;
The borrower’s financial situation must be unlikely to change in the future;
The borrower must have made a good-faith effort to pay his or her loans.

The debtor, a 43-year-old single mother of two, owed $93,000 in student loan debt for both her undergraduate and graduate degrees. The debtor was steadily employed as a social worker, but had recently taken a $6,000 trip to South America to attend training for a career switch to photography. The debtor also financed the purchase of a motorcycle for her ex-husband.

At trial on the issue of undue hardship, her doctor testified that her health was deteriorating, and it was likely that she would be unable to work in the near future. Due to this fact, the court found her health condition to be an additional circumstance that would persist, or worsen, in the near future, satisfying the second requirement of the Brunner test.

The court recognized that the debtor made certain financial errors in the past, such as her trip to South America and the purchase of a motorcycle. However, the court held that she otherwise lived modestly while working full time. Ultimately, the court held that the debtor could discharge most of her loans, except for $10,000 which the court determined to be frivolous spending.

Click here to read more on this story.

Related Resources:

http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=8b4f44fe-0baa-4e50-b4f8-d77adda86096

http://www.usnews.com/education/blogs/student-loan-ranger/2014/08/13/debunking-the-student-loan-bankruptcy-myth

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Federal Suit would take Google’s Payday lending crackdown a step further

Posted on June 3, 2016by Admin

Google has announced that beginning in July, it will stop selling ads to payday lenders and other companies in the business of short-term, high-interest consumer loans. Currently, when a consumer types into Google “need cash now,” the results are paid advertisements from high interest lenders and companies that refer them customers.

However, beneath those paid advertisements are search results with links to websites, such as INeedALoan.net and LocalCashNow.com that promise to connect borrowers with the same type of predatory loans. But a lawsuit filed by a federal watchdog could make it harder for those lead-generation sites to operate and may even put some out of business.

Last year, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) sued T3Leads, a Burbank broker that sells consumer loan inquiries to online lenders alleging that it does little to prevent the lead-generation sites it works with from making misleading claims.

Online lenders are already worried over Google’s decision to no longer sell ads for short-term or high-interest loans — those that must be repaid within 60 days or that carry interest rates of 36% or higher. Google sources said the policy, which goes into effect July 13, will also apply to lead-generation websites that sell consumer data to those lenders.

On the typical lead-generation site, borrowers fill out an application, provide names, addresses, even Social Security and bank account numbers. Once borrowers click submit, it triggers a series of nearly instant transactions.

First, the information is usually sold by the lead-generation site to an aggregator like T3. Next, the aggregator auctions the information to lenders. Finally, the borrower is automatically redirected to the website of whichever lender won the auction.

The CFPB alleges that the process can result in consumers being tricked into taking out loans from lenders that charge the highest interest because often they are the highest bidders for the lead.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans

Local Doral Company Sued for Running a Massive Student Loan Debt Scam

Posted on June 2, 2016by Admin

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi are suing the Doral-based, Student Aid Center, for illegal business practices in the hopes of recouping some of consumers’ lost money.

The Student Aid Center, which claimed to help graduates relieve themselves of student loan debt, is now facing serious legal trouble of its own. The two owners filed for bankruptcy in February, stating the company had liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.

In addition to the FTC and the State of Florida complaint, Minnesota and the District of Columbia have filed lawsuits accusing Student Aid Center of “deceptive practices.” The Minnesota lawsuit alleges one of the owner’s Instagram account frequently referenced Jordan Belfort, the money-grubbing stockbroker depicted in the Leonardo DiCaprio film The Wolf of Wall Street.) The account has since been taken down.

The owners were savvy marketers, running advertisements on social media, radio spots, Google ads promoting the tagline, “Obama Loan Forgiveness,” and even in one case, an aerial banner flying over South Beach.

The complaint brought by the FTC and the State of Florida says Student Aid Center “preyed on consumers’ anxiety about student loan debt” by falsely promising to reduce or even eliminate it.

The company demanded upfront fees in five monthly installments of $199 or more, according to the complaint- even though graduates can apply for government loan forgiveness programs free of charge. Student Aid Center went as far to tell its customers to stop paying their lenders and instead pay the company directly, the lawsuit alleges.

But although the company lured in customers by promising a 100 percent money-back guarantee, Student Aid Center later deflected those who demanded refunds by either not returning the money or returning an amount much less than what had been paid, according to the FTC.

Click here read more on this story.