student loan debt Archives - Page 22 of 27

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

More Attorneys Push for Bankruptcy to Cover Student Loan Debt

Posted on June 20, 2016by Admin

St. Cloud lawyer, Wesley Scott is outraged about the mounting debts student loan borrowers are facing. The bankruptcy attorney has written at least four times to U.S. senators from Minnesota about the issue. Specifically, he wants Senators Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken to help change Chapter 13 bankruptcy rules to make student loan debt dischargeable, as with other debts in bankruptcy.

Graduates of four-year post secondary programs in Minnesota faced an average debt load of $32,000 in 2014. That number was $21,000 in 2005, according to The Institute for College Access & Success.

The bankruptcy code used to be more lenient, allowing people to discharge their student loan debt. It still does, but the deck is stacked against borrowers and it’s something that rarely happens. Debtors must show an undue hardship in court.

Bankruptcy lawyer Scott is proposing one other change to the law, an “at least” option, which would allow debtors going through Chapter 13 proceedings to make payments on their student loans designating them as a priority debt.

Under the current Chapter 13 provisions, people in bankruptcy need to first eliminate debts such as unpaid child support, taxes and mortgages. Debts from student loans, medical bills and credit cards are paid at the end.

In an emailed statement, Franken said student loan debt should be eligible for discharge in bankruptcy, but, “it’s clear we need to address this problem on several fronts.” The senator said he has introduced a bill that would allow people to discharge private student loan debt, one to address tuition costs and another allowing students to refinance their debt.

Also in an emailed statement, Klobuchar said she is supporting a bill that would allow refinancing and one that would strengthen the federal Pell Grant program, which provides payments- not loans, to students.

The total value of outstanding federal student loans was about $1.2 trillion in the first quarter of 2016, up more than 130 percent from $516 billion in 2007. From July 2006 to June 2015, interest rates for federal loans ranged from 3.4 to 8.5 percent. They now fall between 4.3 and 6.8 percent.

Those figures are affecting about 42 million Americans with federal loans, not including private student loans. With no relief in bankruptcy, some people are turning to other options.

A woman with approximately $70,000 in student loan debt went to visit a St. Cloud bankruptcy attorney with her husband. But after leaving the attorney’s office, the couple went upstairs to a divorce lawyer. It was not because they didn’t love each other anymore, the woman had to be single to qualify for an income-based repayment plan. That’s the only way they could survive.

Click here to read more on this story.

For borrowers who are struggling with student loan debt, relief options are available. Many student loan borrowers are unaware that they have rights and repayment options available to them, such as postponement of loan payments, reduction of payments or even a complete discharge of the debt. It is important you contact an experienced Miami bankruptcy attorney who can advise you of all your options. As an experienced CPA as well as a proven bankruptcy lawyer, Timothy Kingcade knows how to help clients take full advantage of the bankruptcy laws to protect their assets and get successful results. Since 1996 Kingcade & Garcia, P.A. has been helping people from all walks of life build a better tomorrow. Our attorneys help thousands of people every year take advantage of their rights under bankruptcy protection to restart, rebuild and recover. The day you hire our firm, we will contact your creditors to stop the harassment. You can also find useful consumer information on the Kingcade & Garcia website at www.miamibankruptcy.com.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Survey Reveals Student Loan Debt Hurting the Housing Market

Posted on June 15, 2016by Admin

Approximately three-quarters of people who have student loan debt say it is hindering them from purchasing a home, according to a recent survey. Although a college degree increases a person’s chances of obtaining a good job and a secure future, the survey found that many would-be homeowners are increasingly burdened by student loan debt.

Seventy-one percent of those surveyed said their student loan debt is delaying them from buying a home. More than half said they expect that delay to last longer than five years.

With 43 million Americans carrying nearly $1.3 trillion in student debt, the burden is affecting all parts of the economy. The home ownership rate among those 35-and-younger has declined from 44 percent at the height of the housing boom to 34 percent today.

Forty-three percent of those surveyed carried between $10,001 and $40,000 in student loan debt, while 38 percent owed $50,000 or more. The most common debt range was between $20,000 and $30,000.

As a result of their student loan debt, 69 percent of borrowers said they did not feel financially secure enough to buy a home, while 80 percent said they cannot save up enough for a down payment. This is not only affecting first-time home buyers, but also “move-up” buyers. A third of those surveyed who are current homeowners said they cannot afford to sell their home and purchase another because of their student loan debt.

Among the reasons cited were the expense of moving and upgrading to a new home, credit problems caused by student loan debt and owing more than their home is worth because student loan debt has limited their ability to pay more than the minimum on their mortgage payment.

The 33-question survey was sent to 75,000 student borrowers, of which 3,230 responded. Among the respondents, 67 percent attended a four-year college and 27 percent attended a graduate/post-graduate school. Two-thirds went to a public institution. Seventy-one percent are employed full time while 14 percent are part-time but seeking full-time employment, according to the National Association of Realtors and American Student Assistance, who conducted the survey.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

This Bill would make Certain Forgiven Student Loan Debt Tax-Free

Posted on June 7, 2016by Admin

Owing on a debt you cannot repay is bad enough, but owing federal taxes on that debt after you no longer have to repay it is even worse. Federal tax law requires that in most cases when a loan is forgiven, the amount that is written off by the lender is taxable income to the previous debtor.

Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Michigan, thinks that it is unfair when the debt was incurred under fraudulent circumstances, specifically to pay for college. She has introduced a bill that would protect defrauded borrowers from being taxed on their forgiven student loan debt, called the Student Tax Relief Act.

Her bill, S. 3008, was drafted in the wake of the Corinthian Colleges, Inc. downfall and the federal investigation that followed. The Department of Education discovered that the now-defunct for-profit chain defrauded students at more than 100 schools in more than 20 states across the country.

Following the fraud finding, the Education Department told students who borrowed money to attend Corinthian classes that they would not have to repay those loans. Affected students can apply for loan forgiveness through the department’s Federal Student Aid division.

As of March 1, nearly 9,000 claims have been processed from former Corinthian students nationwide, totaling more than $132 million, according to The Education Department. The Corinthian students were also provided special tax relief on the amounts written off by the Department of Education.

Stabenow’s bill, which has 7 Democratic co-sponsors in the Senate, would give the same tax relief to students in similar educational fraud cases.

“When students take out loans to attend college, they should get a fair deal and a fair shot,” said Stabenow in announcing the introduction of the Student Tax Relief Act. “No student should be the victim of false advertising from a college that promises skills or job placement. And the last thing they deserve is to be hit with an enormous tax burden on their forgiven loans.”

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans

Local Doral Company Sued for Running a Massive Student Loan Debt Scam

Posted on June 2, 2016by Admin

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi are suing the Doral-based, Student Aid Center, for illegal business practices in the hopes of recouping some of consumers’ lost money.

The Student Aid Center, which claimed to help graduates relieve themselves of student loan debt, is now facing serious legal trouble of its own. The two owners filed for bankruptcy in February, stating the company had liabilities between $1 million and $10 million.

In addition to the FTC and the State of Florida complaint, Minnesota and the District of Columbia have filed lawsuits accusing Student Aid Center of “deceptive practices.” The Minnesota lawsuit alleges one of the owner’s Instagram account frequently referenced Jordan Belfort, the money-grubbing stockbroker depicted in the Leonardo DiCaprio film The Wolf of Wall Street.) The account has since been taken down.

The owners were savvy marketers, running advertisements on social media, radio spots, Google ads promoting the tagline, “Obama Loan Forgiveness,” and even in one case, an aerial banner flying over South Beach.

The complaint brought by the FTC and the State of Florida says Student Aid Center “preyed on consumers’ anxiety about student loan debt” by falsely promising to reduce or even eliminate it.

The company demanded upfront fees in five monthly installments of $199 or more, according to the complaint- even though graduates can apply for government loan forgiveness programs free of charge. Student Aid Center went as far to tell its customers to stop paying their lenders and instead pay the company directly, the lawsuit alleges.

But although the company lured in customers by promising a 100 percent money-back guarantee, Student Aid Center later deflected those who demanded refunds by either not returning the money or returning an amount much less than what had been paid, according to the FTC.

Click here read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Court Revives Lawsuit over Fraudulent Student Loans

Posted on May 19, 2016by Admin

A federal appeals court has determined that former beauty school students can pursue claims that the U.S. Department of Education violated federal law by collecting student loans it knew may have been fraudulently obtained.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit brought back the lawsuit by former students of Wilfred Academy over the Department of Education’s alleged failure to abide by two federal laws requiring student loan holders to be told that their loans could be discharged if issued under fraudulent premises.

Plaintiffs in Salazar v. King, 15-832-cv, claimed the agency had knowledge, as evidenced by its conclusion in 1996 that misconduct at Wilfred Academy was widespread and that students enrolled improperly. As early as 1988, the U.S. Justice Department brought charges against Wilfred employees for misuse of federal funds and falsifying loan applications.

The plaintiffs argue that to this day they are burdened with loans from education and job training that did not prepare them for a profession.

Judge Gerard Lynch, writing for the panel, found that the Department of Education did not provide notice about the possibility of discharge that is required by the Federal Family Education Loans and Direct Loans statutes.

“Plaintiffs plausibly argue that the fact that the DOE has already determined that any Wilfred borrower who presents a facially valid application alleging false certification will automatically receive a discharge is powerful evidence that the DOE has in its possession reliable information all such Wilfred borrowers ‘may’ be eligible for discharge,” Lynch wrote.

Plaintiffs are also asking the court to compel the department to do something that is not a discretionary function of the agency: comply with the two loan laws and stop collecting loans from the students.

“The presumption in favor of judicial review applies to this case, because plaintiffs challenge what they contend are unlawful actions that the agency has taken, and continues to take, against the plaintiffs themselves,” Lynch wrote. “Such challenges are at the core of the judicial review function.”

According to the Department of Education’s investigation of Wilfred Academy in the 1990s and to the circuit’s ruling, the question of fraud surrounding the student loans focused on whether the school ever certified that students who did not graduate high school had an “ability to benefit” from its program. The plaintiffs allege that they were never asked if they had a high school diploma or given any test to determine if they had an “ability to benefit.”

It is unclear how many former Wilfred students would be involved in the putative class, or how many are still paying loans arranged through Wilfred that could be discharged. More than 61,000 Federal Family Education Loan program loans were issued to Wilfred students between 1986 and 1994. When the action before the Second Circuit was filed in 2014, lawyers for the plaintiffs estimated that there were 40,000 or more students who took out federally guaranteed loans to attend Wilfred campuses.

At its height in the late 1980s, Wilfred operated 58 schools and had an annual enrollment of 11,000 students. Its advertisements featured an eager young student promoting the tagline, “That Wilfred winner—she knows where she’s going.” The Wilfred American Educational Corporation filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in May 1990 and the last Wilfred school shut down in 1994.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Vermont House Asks Congress to Allow Students to Discharge Student Loan Debt in Bankruptcy

Posted on May 3, 2016by Admin

With national student loan debt increasing to more than $1 trillion and Vermont’s graduates stuck with the highest debt-to-earnings ratio, state lawmakers are urging Congress to let students file for bankruptcy to discharge their student loan debt.

This week, members of the Vermont House gave preliminary approval to J.R.H. 27, a resolution that calls for “federal action to alleviate the national student loan debt crisis.” Federal bankruptcy code prohibits student loan debt from being discharged in bankruptcy, except in cases of “undue hardship.”

“The General Assembly requests Congress to amend the federal bankruptcy code to eliminate the prohibition on relief from federal or private student loan debt through the federal bankruptcy system,” the resolution states.

J.R.H. 27 illustrates the scope of the problem. Student loan debt tripled between 2005 and 2015, increasing to $1.19 trillion, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Consumer Credit Panel. Nationwide, almost 7 million student loan borrowers, or 17 percent, are in default as of summer 2015. This is up 400,000 defaults, or 6 percent, compared to 2014.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Murphy Bill will Stop Garnishment of Social Security Benefits to Pay Student Loans

Posted on April 27, 2016by Admin

A bill has been introduced by U.S. Representative Patrick Murphy that will prevent social security benefits from being garnished to repay student loan debt. Murphy says it is a problem that needs to be addressed and believes expanding higher education opportunities and protecting Social Security benefits are key to bolstering the middle class.

In the fiscal year that ended in October, 860,000 individuals had their Social Security benefits reduced to pay for federal debts, with the federal government collecting $382 million, according to the Senate Finance Committee. This number included attempts to collect other debts besides student loans.

According to the General Accountability Office, the number of people whose Social Security benefits were reduced specifically to pay off student loan debt increased from 31,000 in 2002 to 155,000 in 2013. The numbers for those older than age 65 increased from 6,000 to 36,000 in the same period. Some of those were paying down debts incurred to educate their children through co-signing or Parent PLUS loans. In fact, people older than 65 owe $18.2 billion on student loans.

The Murphy Bill is a step in the right direction, but still falls short by failing to alleviate the debt for seniors. Consumer advocates believe the real solution is a change in the law to permit unsustainable student loan debts to be discharged in bankruptcy.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Duxbury Father Wins Student Loan Debt Relief Settlement

Posted on April 19, 2016by Admin

A federal appeals court this week has urged a bankruptcy judge to consider a settlement that would allow a Duxbury father to discharge more than $246,000 of student loan debt he borrowed to send his three children to college.

The case has generated national attention amid the growing concern about student loan debt and what it means for our nation’s economy. For the past four years, The Educational Credit Management Corp., a company hired by the US Department of Education, has vigorously fought the efforts to have the loans discharged in bankruptcy.

Four months after the US First Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in the case and urged the parties to try to settle, the company signed an agreement acknowledging that the debtor should be forgiven because he has proven that repaying the debt would pose an undue hardship. The following day, the appeals court sent the proposed settlement to the bankruptcy court. The final decision lies in the hands of the bankruptcy judge.

Most courts rely on one of two tests when defining hardship. These include: The Brunner test, which requires a borrower to show that he has made a good faith effort to repay the debt, cannot maintain a minimal standard of living for himself and his dependents if forced to repay the loan, and is facing additional circumstances that make it unlikely he will be able to pay in the future.

The second test, called the “totality of the circumstances” test, considers a debtor’s past, present, and future financial resources; living expenses; and any other facts and relevant circumstances surrounding each particular bankruptcy case. When assessing hardship, most courts require borrowers to show extraordinary circumstances, such as a serious illness, psychiatric problem, or permanent disability.

In this case, the debtor Robert Murphy lost his $165,000-a-year position as president of a Canton manufacturing company when it moved overseas in 2002, and had been unable to find another job. He depleted his retirement savings to pay bills, which included more than $61,000 that was applied to his student loan debt, which left him and his wife primarily dependent on her $13,200 teacher’s aide annual salary.

Murphy sought to discharge the $246,000 he still owed on a dozen Parent Plus loans he took out between 2001 and 2007 to send two of his children to Loyola University Maryland and a third to the University of Connecticut and Bridgewater State.

If he had it to do over again, Murphy says he would have never borrowed the money, even though he was unemployed when the government issued him the majority of the loans. Like many in his situation, he believed he would be able to find another high-paying job and repay them. He launched an exhaustive search and attributed his inability to find work to his age, a failing economy and the decrease in manufacturing jobs.

Murphy’s case was being watched by consumer advocates across the country, who hoped the appeals court would take a new look at what defines undue hardship. The settlement has the possibility to preempt a decision that could establish a precedent.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

Judge’s Ruling on Law School Grad’s Debt Could Trigger ‘Seismic’ Shift in Loan Practices

Posted on April 18, 2016by Admin

A judge’s recent ruling to discharge a portion of a law school grad’s student loan debt could have major implications for those struggling with insurmountable student loan debt. The law student applied for the loan while she was studying for the bar exam as a student at Pace University Law School in 2009. She received a “bar loan” of $15,000 from Citibank, according to the bankruptcy court documents, and she made payments on the loan until June 2012. But in November 2014, after having failed the bar exam, she filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.

She wanted the $15,000 loan to be discharged arguing that it was not an “educational benefit” under the U.S. bankruptcy code. Citibank disagreed, arguing that the loan was an “educational benefit” in the fact that the eligibility for the bar loan was dependent on her being a law student.

But Judge Carla Craig of U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Brooklyn wrote in her decision, “However, this argument could be advanced by the myriad private lenders who provide funds to borrowers who are taking educational or training courses. The fact that [Citibank’s] underwriting standards required [Campbell] to be a law student does not turn an arm’s length consumer credit transaction into a ‘benefit’ within the meaning of [the bankruptcy code],” Craig wrote in her opinion.

Although there have been cases involving student loans where judges have ruled the opposite of Judge Craig, this recent decision may have an effect on future cases. This opinion is a confirmation that these loans should be dischargeable in bankruptcy.

Click here to read more on this story.

Bankruptcy Law, Credit, Debt Relief, Student Loans, Timothy Kingcade Posts

The Truth about Millennials and Student Loan Debt

Posted on April 8, 2016by Admin

According to a survey from Citizens Bank, 47 percent of millennials (those in the 18-35 age group), who are college graduates, would be willing to limit their online food delivery in return for reducing their student loans. Concerts, vacations, sporting events and lattes were also priorities.

Limiting any of these luxuries got a “no thanks” from the majority of millennials who were asked if they would consider cutting back to lower their student loan payments. More than half (57 percent) said they regret taking out as many student loans as they did, and about a third of them said they would not have even gone to college if they knew who much it was going to cost them in the end.

Part of the problem has to deal with numbers and denial. The same survey found that nearly half of millennials (45 percent) with student loans do not even know how much of their annual salary they spend on student loan debt. It is 18 percent on average. On the upside, the vast majority of millennials at least know what they owe- more than $40,000 for most.

Here are some suggestions for getting that number down:

Know what you owe.
Millennials who have graduated and have jobs often qualify for better rates than when they had little to no income at the start of school.
Get help at work. A number of companies, including Fidelity and PwC, are offering employees help with paying down their student loan debt.
Seek forgiveness. Certain professions, such as public service jobs, offer student loan forgiveness. Others include public defenders, law enforcement officers, doctors, nurses and some teachers. For example, teachers who work in low-income school districts and teach certain subjects may qualify for complete cancellation of their student loans.

Click here to read more on this story.